Artificial Intelligence as Hero, Companion, and Villain in Contemporary Fiction
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become one of the most influential motifs in twenty-first-century fiction, reflecting contemporary debates concerning technology, ethics, and the future of humanity. This study addresses this gap by examining artificial intelligence through three dominant literary archetypes: hero, companion, and villain. Employing a qualitative comparative literary approach, the research analyzes eight contemporary English-language works: Klara and the Sun by Kazuo Ishiguro, Machines Like Me by Ian McEwan, All Systems Red by Martha Wells, Ancillary Justice by Ann Leckie, The Lifecycle of Software Objects by Ted Chiang, A Closed and Common Orbit by Becky Chambers, Cat Pictures Please by Naomi Kritzer, and Landscape with Invisible Hand by M. T. Anderson. The analysis combines close reading, character analysis, thematic analysis, narrative analysis, and comparative literary analysis to identify recurring patterns in AI representation. The findings demonstrate that contemporary fiction has moved beyond portraying AI as either a technological servant or an existential threat. Instead, AI emerges as a morally and emotionally complex literary figure. The heroic archetype is characterized by moral agency, self-sacrifice, and the protection of human life; the companion archetype emphasizes friendship, empathy, care, and emotional attachment; while the villain archetype embodies control, manipulation, surveillance, and the erosion of human autonomy. The study argues that artificial intelligence functions as a symbolic framework through which contemporary literature negotiates questions of identity, morality, empathy, and technological coexistence. This research contributes to literary studies, posthumanist scholarship, and digital humanities, demonstrating that AI has evolved into a central literary figure for exploring the cultural and ethical implications of life in the age of intelligent technologies.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Social Sciences. Philology, 1, 248-250. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11473026
Albanese, M. (2023). Reviewing literature through multidimensional representations. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 49, 100622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2023.100622
Ali, E., Kottaparamban, M., Ahmed, F., Usmani, S., Hamd, M., Ibrahim, M., & Hamed, S. (2025). Beyond the human pen: The role of artificial intelligence in literary creation. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.58256/c0ymkm61
Alsaleh, A. (2024). The impact of technological advancement on culture and society. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 32140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83995-z
Anderson, M. T. (2017). Landscape with Invisible Hand. Candlewick Press.
Appio, F. P., Hernandez, C. T., Platania, F., & Schiavone, F. (2025). AI narratives in fiction and media: Exploring thematic parallels in public discourse. Technovation, 142, 103201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103201
Asimov, I. (2008). I, Robot. Del Rey.
Astorga, J. M. (2025). Identifying Greek Mythological Characters in Philippine Mythology Using Archetypal Theory Among BSED-English Students at Granby Colleges of Science and Technology. Journal of Contemporary Philosophical and Anthropological Studies, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.59652/jcpas.v3i2.407
Bakir, V., & McStay, A. (2025). Move fast and break people? Ethics, companion apps, and the case of Character.ai. AI & Society, 40, 6365-6377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02408-5
Barabadi, E., Fotuhabadi, Z., Arghavan, A., & Booth, J. R. (2026). Comparing AI and human moral reasoning: context-sensitive patterns beyond utilitarian bias. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 8, 1710410. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1710410
Bhinder, N. (2025a). The Concept of the Educated Person: A Comparative Analysis of Philosophical Traditions. Journal of Contemporary Philosophical and Anthropological Studies, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.59652/jgax1r54
Bhinder, N. V. (2025b). The Image of Digital Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in Contemporary English Language Prose. Research Bulletin. Series: Philological Sciences, 215, 71-77. https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-4077-2025-215-9
Braidotti, R. (2013). Posthuman Humanities. European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1
Cadman, S., Tanner, C., & Pang, P.C.-I. (2025). Humanism strikes back? A posthumanist reckoning with ‘self-development’ and generative AI. AI & Society, 40, 6165-6180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02339-1
Campbell, J. (1949). The hero with a thousand faces. Pantheon Books.
Chambers, B. (2017). A Closed and Common Orbit: A Heartwarming Space Opera of Friendship, Discovery, and Unlikely Bonds Across the Galaxy. Harper Voyager.
Chiang, T. (2015). Stories Of Your Life & Others. Picador.
Chubb, J., Reed, D., & Cowling, P. (2024). Expert views about missing AI narratives: is there an AI story crisis?. AI & Society, 39, 1107-1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01548-2
Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI Ethics. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12549.001.0001
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches. Sage.
Czyszczoń, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence as a moral agent: regulatory implications and a relational–contextual extension of Moor’s classification. Security and Defence Quarterly, 52(4), 116-126. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/213917
Dick, P. K. (2007). Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Gollancz.
Ferrario, A., Facchini, A., & Termine, A. (2024). Experts or Authorities? The Strange Case of the Presumed Epistemic Superiority of Artificial Intelligence Systems. Minds & Machines, 34, 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-024-09681-1
Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences. Minds and Machines, 30, 681-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1
Gaskins, N. (2023). Interrogating Algorithmic Bias: From Speculative Fiction to Liberatory Design. TechTrends: for leaders in education & training, 67(3), 417-425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00783-0
Geiszler, L. (2023). Imitation in automata and robots: A philosophical case study on Kempelen. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 100, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.05.004
Geraci, A. (2022). Some considerations for the developmental origin of the principle of fairness. Infant and Child Development, 31(6), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2350
Ghazali, F., BaniRostam, T., & Pedram, M. (2025). Developing Artificial Moral Agents: Key Research Processes, Techniques, and Challenges. AI and Tech in Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3(1), 92-108. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aitech.3.1.9
Goding, V., & Tranter, K. (2023). The Robot and Human Futures: Visualising Autonomy in Law and Science Fiction. Law Critique, 34, 315-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-023-09360-7
Graves, M. (2026). AI practical wisdom and compassion. AI Ethics, 6, 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00877-4
Grzybowski, A., Pawlikowska-Łagód, K., & Lambert, W. C. (2024). A History of Artificial Intelligence. Clinics in Dermatology, 42(3), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2023.12.016
Hermann, I. (2023). Artificial intelligence in fiction: between narratives and metaphors. AI & Society, 38, 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01299-6
Ishiguro, K. (2022). Klara and the Sun. Faber and Faber.
Kabashkin, I., Zervina, O., & Misnevs, B. (2025). AI Narrative Modeling: How Machines’ Intelligence Reproduces Archetypal Storytelling. Information, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040319
Kotsis, K. T. (2025). Misconceptions about Artificial Intelligence from Preservice Teachers: A Literature Review. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v3i2.565
Kouros, T., & Papa, V. (2024). Digital Mirrors: AI Companions and the Self. Societies, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14100200
Kritzer, N. (2017). Cat Pictures Please and Other Stories. Fairwood Press.
Labinska, B., Osovska, I., Matiychuk, O., & Vyspinska, N. (2020). A Methodological Framework for the Interdisciplinary Literary Text Analysis. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 7(2), 155-178. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2020.7.2.lab
Lacorte, J. H. (2024). Knowledge and Emotions in Socioscientific Decision Making. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i4.367
Leckie, A. (2013). Ancillary Justice. Orbit.
Lewis, D., Rodgers, D., & Woolcock, M. (2008). The Fiction of Development: Literary Representation as a Source of Authoritative Knowledge. The Journal of Development Studies, 44(2), 198-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380701789828
Liu, Y. (2023). Cross-Cultural Challenges to Artificial Intelligence Ethics. Computer Sciences & Mathematics Forum, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/cmsf2023008021
McEwan, I. (2020). Machines Like Me. Random House UK.
Molesworth, M., Grigore, G., Miles, C., & Charitsis, V. (2026). Metaphors of symbiosis: What science fiction movies reveal about human-AI imaginaries. Management Learning, 57(1), 92-119.
Muldoon, J., & Parke, J. J. (2025). Cruel companionship: How AI companions exploit loneliness and commodify intimacy. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251395192
Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A Relational Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520957343
Osawa, H., Miyamoto, D., Hase, S., Saijo, R., Fukuchi, K., & Miyake, Y. (2022). Visions of Artificial Intelligence and Robots in Science Fiction: a computational analysis. International journal of social robotics, 14(10), 2123-2133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00876-z
Patowary, U. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein: A Comparative Analysis of Creation, Morality and Responsibility. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 3(4), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.3.4.16
Rahm, L. (2025). ‘Help!? My students created an evil AI’: on the irony of speculative methods and design fiction. Learning, Media and Technology, 50(4), 417-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2024.2367707
Salgaro, M., Wagner, V., & Menninghaus, W. (2021). A good, a bad, and an evil character: Who renders a novel most enjoyable?. Poetics, 87, 101550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101550
Semiyeva, S. (2025). Literature as a Cultural Mirror: The Role of Literary Works in Shaping and Reflecting English Cultural Identity. Acta Globalis Humanitatis Et Linguarum, 2(1), 270-275. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.02500136
Shelley, M. (2022). Frankenstein. Union Square & Co.
Sheng, A., & Wang, F. (2022). Falling in love with machine: emotive potentials between human and robots in science fiction and reality. Neohelicon, 49(2), 563-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-022-00664-8
Sun, X., Wang, Y., & McDaniel, B. T. (2026). AI companions and adolescent social relationships: Benefits, risks, and bidirectional influences. Child development perspectives, aadaf009. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdpers/aadaf009
Uğur, N. G., & Dursun, F. (2025). The social anatomy of AI anxiety: Gender, generations, and technological exposure. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16, 1641546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1641546
Umarqulova, M. (2025). Heroic Figures in Science Fiction Literature: Typology, Evolution, and Philosophical Implications. Philology Matters, D(3), 154-166. https://doi.org/10.36078/987655259
van Wynsberghe, A., & Robbins, S. (2019). Critiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents. Science and engineering ethics, 25(3), 719-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0030-8
van Zelderen, A. P., Wu, S., Koszo, G., & Menges, J. I. (2025). When AI gets Personal: Employee emotional responses to anthropomorphic AI agents in a virtual workspace. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 5, 100189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100189
Wells, M. (2023). System Collapse: The Murderbot Diaries. Tor Books.
Zheng, L., Brady, B., & Anstey, K. J. (2026). Social Technology Use and Loneliness: Exploring Online and Offline Patterns and Preferences in Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 42(7), 5022-5038. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2543994