Lazy or Creative: Linguistic Behavior of Filipinos

Main Article Content

John Mark Astorga

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the linguistic behavior of Filipinos through the lens of the pragmatic philosophy of language and the prototype theory of cognitive linguistics. It provides answers to whether Filipinos are linguistically lazy or linguistically creative. Surprisingly, Filipinos do not usually care about what a word or a concept is; they only care about how a word will be used in their daily lives. This research uses textual analysis methodology to provide possible explanations for the linguistic traits of Filipinos using philosophy and cognitive linguistics. In-depth analysis of the works of William James and Eleanor Rosch was done to answer the research problem. Pragmatism explains that Filipinos are genius communicators who prioritize the practical use of a word rather than its definite meaning, while prototype theory validates the wisdom of Filipino people in creating prototypes in language for easy communication. Therefore, this paper concludes that Filipinos are linguistically creative and not lazy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Astorga, J. M. (2024). Lazy or Creative: Linguistic Behavior of Filipinos. Journal of Contemporary Philosophical and Anthropological Studies, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.59652/jcpas.v2i3.278
Section
Research Articles

References

James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Longmans, Green, and Co.

Korta, K., & Perry, J. (2024). Pragmatics In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/pragmatics/

Lotha, G., & Singh, S. (2024). Pilipino Language: Reference & Edit History. In Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/cebuano-language

McFarland, C. D. (2008). Linguistic Diversity and English in the Philippines. https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622099470.003.0008

McFarland, C. D. (2008). Linguistic diversity and English in the Philippines. In M. A. Lourdes S. Bautista, and Kingsley Bolton (eds), Philippine English: Linguistic and Literary. Hong Kong. https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622099470.003.0008

Orillaneda, B. C. (2016). Maritime Trade in the Philippines During the 15th Century CE. Social Science Research on Southeast Asia, 27, 83-100. https://doi.org/10.4000/moussons.3529

Pizarro-Guevarra, J. S., & Garcia, R. (2024). Philippine Psycholinguistics. Annual Review of Linguistics, 10, 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031522-102844

Rosch, E. (1973). On the Internal Structure of Perceptual and Semantic Categories. Cognitive Psychology, 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-505850-6.50010-4

Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive Representation of Semantic Categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192-233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192