A Theoretical Analysis Of Philosophical Dimensions In Engineering Education
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article presents a theoretical analysis of the philosophical dimensions embedded in engineering education, highlighting the importance of integrating ethical, social, and environmental considerations into the development of future engineers. As engineering increasingly shapes society through technological innovation, philosophical inquiry becomes crucial in addressing contemporary challenges such as sustainability, technological ethics, and social justice. The paper explores how philosophical frameworks, such as utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, provide engineers with tools to critically evaluate the broader impact of their designs and decisions. By embedding these ethical perspectives within the engineering curriculum, educators can prepare students to navigate the moral complexities inherent in technology and innovation. Moreover, the analysis underscores the role of philosophy in promoting sustainability in engineering, encouraging students to adopt a long-term view of environmental stewardship and resource management. The discussion also highlights the importance of addressing issues related to technological ethics, particularly in the development of artificial intelligence, automation, and biotechnology, where ethical challenges are becoming increasingly prominent. In addition, the paper examines the contribution of philosophy in fostering critical thinking and social responsibility, ensuring that engineers consider the societal implications of their work, especially in marginalized communities. Ultimately, this theoretical analysis argues that integrating philosophy into engineering education is essential for preparing engineers who are not only technically proficient but also ethically conscious, socially responsible, and capable of addressing the complex global challenges that define modern society.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abdul-Rahaman, A.-M., & Tindam, T. N. (2024). Assessing the Effectiveness of Science, Technology, Engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Education on Students’ Achievement in Secondary Schools. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i2.179
Alemdar, M., & Aytaç, A. (2022). The impact of teachers’ educational philosophy tendencies on their curriculum autonomy. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(1), 270-284. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2022.166
Alhazmi, A. A., & Kaufmann, A. (2022). Phenomenological Qualitative Methods Applied to the Analysis of Cross-Cultural Experience in Novel Educational Social Contexts. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 785134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134
Arhun, S., Trunova, I., Hnatov, A., & Hnatova, H. (2023). Innovative approaches to the education of students of technical specialties in the conditions of war in Ukraine. Vehicle and Electronics. Innovative Technologies, 24, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.30977/VEIT.2023.24.0.4
Azzaakiyyah, H. K., Wanof, M. I., Suherlan, S., & Fitri, W. S. (2023). Business Philosophy Education and Improving Critical Thinking Skills of Business Students. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i1.1
Bano, F., Alomar, M. A., Alotaibi, F. M., Serbaya, S. H., Rizwan, A., & Hasan, F. (2024). Leveraging Virtual Reality in Engineering Education to Optimize Manufacturing Sustainability in Industry 4.0. Sustainability, 16(18), 7927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16187927
Børsen, T., Serreau, Y., Reifschneider, K., Baier, A., Pinkelman, R., Smetanina, T., & Zandvoort, H. (2020). Initiatives, experiences and best practices for teaching social and ecological responsibility in ethics education for science and engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(2), 186–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1701632
Bouville, M. (2008). On Using Ethical Theories to Teach Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9034-5
Brink, S. C., de Hei, M., Sjoer, E., Carlsson, C. J., Georgsson, F., Keller, E., … Admiraal, W. (2024). Curriculum Agility principles for transformative innovation in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2024.2398165
Burns, M., Bally, J., Burles, M., Holtslander, L., & Peacock, S. (2022). Constructivist Grounded Theory or Interpretive Phenomenology? Methodological Choices Within Specific Study Contexts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221077758
Chmyr, V, Koriekhov, A, Psol, S, Partyka, S. (2024). Fostering digital transformations in militray engineering education: Introduction of a technology-enhanced learning environment. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(2), 162-185. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.162
Chmyr, V. & Bhinder, N. (2023). AI in the Higher Military Institutions: Challenges and Perspectives for Military Engineering Training. Rupkatha Journal, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v15n4.11
Chmyr, V. (2022). Ways to increase the efficiency of usage of automobiles by the organs of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine while carrying out transportation during the Martial Law. Collection of scientific works of the National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine. Series: Military and Technical Sciences, 88(3), 332-347. https://doi.org/10.32453/3.v88i3.1213
Claris, L., & Riley, D. (2012). Situation critical: critical theory and critical thinking in engineering education. Engineering Studies, 4(2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2011.649920
d’Escoffier, L. N., Guerra, A., & Braga, M. (2024). Problem-Based Learning and Engineering Education for Sustainability: Where we are and where could we go?. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v12i1.7799
Dhobi, S. (2023). Philosophical Approaches in Qualitative Research. Journal of Population and Development, 4(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.3126/jpd.v4i1.64248
Eklund, M. (2024). Conceptual engineering and conceptual innovation. Inquiry, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2024.2384066
Ferdman, A., & Ratti, E. (2024). What Do We Teach to Engineering Students: Embedded Ethics, Morality, and Politics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 30 (7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00469-1
Frigo, G., Marthaler, F., Albers, A., Ott, S., & Hillerbrand, R. (2021). Training responsible engineers. Phronesis and the role of virtues in teaching engineering ethics. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 26(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2021.1889086
Gabay, G., Hackett, P. M. W., & Hayre, C. (2023). Editorial: Philosophical perspectives on qualitative psychological and social science research. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1237980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1237980
Hannon, M., & Nguyen, J. (2022). Understanding philosophy. Inquiry, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2146186
Heywood, J. (2022). Philosophy and Engineering Education: Should Teachers Have a Philosophy of Education?. In Philosophy and Engineering Education. Synthesis Lectures on Engineering, Science, and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03761-0_1
Hovey, R. B., Vigouroux, M., Noushi, N., Pavate, V., & Amja, K. (2022). Applied Philosophical Hermeneutic Research: the unmethod. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221101237
Kobernyk, O., Yashchuk, S., Yermakova, S., Chmyr, V., Bukina, T., & Romanenko, V. (2022). The Latest Trends in The Professional Training of Masters in the Field of Engineering and Technology. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, 14(1Sup1), 453-471. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.1Sup1/561
Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Teaching Physics in the Kitchen: Bridging Science Education and Everyday Life. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i1.109
Kushnirenko, О., & Gakhovich, N. (2023). Strategic directions of Ukrainian engineering post-war recovery. University Economic Bulletin, 56, 05-15. https://doi.org/10.31470/2306-546X-2023-56-05-15
Kuzmenko, A., Matviienko, L., Kanova, L., Burenko, M., & Bukliv, R. (2022). Development of Ukrainian education and science in the context of global challenges and military aggression: results, problems, prospects. Amazonia Investiga, 11(58), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.58.10.19
Laktionova, A. (2023). Philosophy of Engineering and Design Technological Actions: Rationality, Argumentation, Modelling. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 29(1), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2023-29-1-7
Lavrysh, Y., Lytovchenko, I., Lukianenko, V., & Golub, T. (2022). Teaching during the wartime: Experience from Ukraine. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2098714
Leng L. (2020). The Role of Philosophical Inquiry in Helping Students Engage in Learning. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 449. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00449
Martin, D. A., Conlon, E., & Bowe, B. (2021). A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27, 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00333-6
Matta, C. (2021). Philosophical Paradigms in Qualitative Research Methods Education: What is their Pedagogical Role? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(6), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1958372
Matviichuk, L., Ferilli, S., & Hnedko, N. (2022). Study of the Organization and Implementation of E-Learning in Wartime Inside Ukraine. Future Internet, 14(10), 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14100295
Ming, X., van der Veen, J., & MacLeod, M. (2024). Competencies in interdisciplinary engineering education: constructing perspectives on interdisciplinarity in a Q-sort study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2024.2397419
Mitcham, C. (2009). A historico-ethical perspective on engineering education: from use and convenience to policy engagement. Engineering Studies, 1(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378620902725166
Musheke, M., & Phiri, J. (2021) The Effects of Effective Communication on Organizational Performance Based on the Systems Theory. Open Journal of Business and Management, 9, 659-671. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2021.92034
Nadurak, V. (2023). Critical thinking: concept and practice. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 28(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2022-28-2-7
Narong, D. K., & Hallinger, P. (2024). Traversing the Evolution of Research on Engineering Education for Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review (1991–2022). Sustainability, 16(2), 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020641
Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on medical education, 8(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
Purzer, Ş., Quintana-Cifuentes, J., & Menekse, M. (2022). The honeycomb of engineering framework: Philosophy of engineering guiding precollege engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20441
Sánchez-Carracedo, F., & López, D. (2020). Innovation in Engineering Education for Sustainable Development – Introduction to a Special Issue. Sustainability, 12(19), 8132. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198132
Syahidi, K., Sarjan, M., Rokhmat, J., Syahrial, A., Mertha, I. G., Arizona, K., Syamsuddin, S., & Sucilestari, R. (2023). Educational Philosophy and Its Relationship to Development Curriculum 2013. Lambda : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA dan Aplikasinya, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.58218/lambda.v3i1.514
Tell, J., & Hoveskog, M. (2022). Applied engineering education for soft skills in the context of sustainability and mobility. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(8), 324-336. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2022-0202
Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., & Boon, M. (2020). Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 508-555. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20347
Vyshnevska, N., & Chmyr, V. (2022). Formation of the professional competence of future border officers of the engineering and technical subdivisions of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine. Science and Technology Today, 12(12), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6025-2022-12(12)-118-127
Zhuang, Y., & Song, Z. (2019). A Systematic Review of Grounded Theory Methodology: Re-Grounding in Weber. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 21(9). https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v21i9.2689