The Memory-Method-Perspective Model: Three Dimensions to Thinking Historically
Main Article Content
Abstract
Historical thinking is an integrative and reflexive process, yet existing pedagogical frameworks often isolate its components, leading to conceptual fragmentation. This study introduces the Memory-Method-Perspective (MMP) model as a synthesis-oriented alternative to Seixas’ influential six-part model. Anchored in the philosophies of Collingwood and contemporary cognitive theories, the MMP model reframes historical thinking into three interactive dimensions: Memory, encompassing substantive and procedural knowledge; Method, which ensures analytical precision and contextual interpretation; and Perspective, fostering ethical and critical reflexivity. The model’s triadic structure provides a unified lens through which historical inquiry transcends procedural rigidity to engage with the past as a dynamic interplay of thought, action, and moral reflection. By emphasizing integration and ethical responsibility, the MMP model not only addresses the fragmentation in contemporary historical education but also equips educators and students with tools to combat misinformation and cultivate nuanced historical consciousness. This work invites further dialogue on the philosophical and practical implications of holistic frameworks in history education.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Agoncillo, T. (1977). History as humanities. The Manila Review, 13, 33–39.
Angeles, V. S. (2024). Race, Ethnicity and Identity: The Moros of the Philippines. In The Routledge Handbook of Islam and Race (pp. 637-651). Routledge.
Bain, R. B. (2015). Commentary: Into the swampy lowlands of important problems. In New directions in assessing historical thinking (pp. 64-72). Routledge.
Barton, K.C. (2017). Shared Principles in History and Social Science Education. In M. Carretero, S. Berger, M. Grever, M. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Research in Historical Culture and Education. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_24
Callaway, A. (2020). Analyzing students’ historical thinking skills at different grade levels (Master’s thesis, Eastern Illinois University). The Keep. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/4840
Carroll, W. H. (1996). Banning the Supernatural: Why Historians must not rule out the action of God in history. Catholic Social Science Review, 1, 73-81.
Christian, D. (2018). Origin story: A big history of everything. Hachette UK.
Church, I. M., & Samuelson, P. L. (2017). Intellectual Humility: An Introduction to the Philosophy and Science. London/Oxford/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Collingwood, R. G. (1994). The Idea of History. Revised Edition. Oxford University Press.
Collingwood, R. G. (1998). An essay on metaphysics. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1940)
Collingwood, R. G. (1999). The principles of history: and other writings in philosophy of history. Clarendon Press.
Collingwood, R.G. (1946). The historical imagination. In The idea of history. Oxford University Press.
Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 Gabay Pangkurikulum: Araling Panlipunan. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/AP-CG.pdf
Domínguez-Castillo, J., Arias-Ferrer, L., Sánchez-Ibáñez, R., Egea-Vivancos, A., García-Crespo, F. J., & Miralles-Martínez, P. (2021). A competence-based test to assess historical thinking in secondary education: Design, application, and validation. Historical Encounters, 8(1), 30-45. DOI:10.52289/hej8.103
Duquette, C. (2015). Relating historical consciousness to historical thinking through assessment. In New directions in assessing historical thinking (pp. 51-63). Routledge.
Elder, L., Paul, R., & Gorzycki, M. (2011). Student guide to historical thinking (Thinker’s Guide Library). Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Ellis, D. L., & Vincent, M. A. (2020). How Well Do Structured Controversy Debates – and a Dash of “Fake History” – Promote Historical Thinking? The History Teacher, 53(2), 209–237. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27058579
Fordham, M. (2017). Thinking makes it so: cognitive psychology and history teaching. https://www.history.org.uk/publications/resource/9184/thinking-makes-it-so-cognitive-psychology-and-his
Gentallan, J.N. & Pandan, M.S. (2024). Historical Thinking Skills of Education Students Across Specializations. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(2), 198-205. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12748987
Guiang, F. J. P. A. (2022). Myth-making and history-writing: Marcosian revisionism as evidence of therapeutic historiography. Pingkian: Journal for Emancipation and Anti-imperialist Education, 7(1), 23-49.
Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. Random House.
Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo deus. Random House.
Hughes-Warrington, M. (1996). ‘How good an historian shall I be?’: R. G. Collingwood on education. Oxford Review of Education, 22(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/030549896022020
Innset, O. (2022). Metahistory as Public History: On Introducing Metahistorical Perspectives in Events about Events. History, 107(375), 392-407. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-229X.13265
Kidd, I. J. (2014). Humility and history. Think, 13(38), 59-68.
Koons, R. C. (2022). A dynamic B theory of time. In Powers, time and free will (pp. 69-82). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Kreeft, P. (2015). Christianity for modern pagans: Pascal’s Pensées. Ignatius Press.
Lewis, C. S. (1966). Surprised by joy: The shape of my early life. Harcourt, Brace & World.
Murphey, M. G. (1994). Philosophical foundations of historical knowledge. State University of New York Press.
Nokes, J.D. (2022). Building Students’ Historical Literacies: Learning to Read and Reason With Historical Texts and Evidence (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003183495
Pandan, M. S., Bantugan, L. J., Liguid, R., Albarico, G., & Doria, E. (2023). Historical Thinking Skills and Fake News Susceptibility of Grade 10 Learners. Lukad: An Online Journal of Pedagogy, 3(1), 33 - 49.
Paul, H., & Kleinberg, E. (2018). Are historians ontological realists? An exchange. Rethinking History, 22(4), 546-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2018.1530820
Pelczer, I., Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2014). Dynamic thinking and static thinking in problem solving: do they explain different patterns of students’ answers?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 217-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.146
Peterson, J. B. (2002). Maps of meaning: The architecture of belief. Routledge.
Piñon, M. (1973). Fundamental logic. Rex Bookstore.
Rescher, N. (2003). Epistemology: An introduction to the theory of knowledge. State University of New York Press.
Retz, T. (2017). Why Re-enactment is not Empathy, Once and for All. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 11(3), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341376
Ruin, H. (2019). The claim of the past – historical consciousness as memory, haunting, and responsibility in Nietzsche and beyond. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(6), 798–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1652936
Salinas, C., Blevins, B., & Sullivan, C. C. (2012). Critical historical thinking: When official narratives collide with other narratives. Multicultural Perspectives, 14(1), 18–27.
Santiago, M., & Dozono, T. (2022). History is critical: Addressing the false dichotomy between historical inquiry and criticality. Theory & Research in Social Education, 50(2), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2048426
Schumacher, J. N. (1978). Rizal the Revolutionary and the Ateneo. Philippine Studies, 26(3), 231-240. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42632435
Scott, W. H. (1994). Barangay: Sixteenth-century Philippine culture and society. Ateneo de Manila University Press.
Seixas, P. (2015). A model of historical thinking. Educational philosophy and theory, 49(6), 593-605. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1101363
Simbulan, D. C. (2005). The modern principalia: The historical evolution of the Philippine ruling oligarchy. UP Press.
VanSledright, B. (2011). The challenge of rethinking history education. Routledge.
Waldis, M., Hodel, J., Thünemann, H., Zülsdorf-Kersting, M., & Ziegler, B. (2015). Material-based and open-ended writing tasks for assessing narrative competence among students. In New directions in assessing historical thinking (pp. 117-131). Routledge.
Wineburg, S. (2010). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Phi delta kappan, 92(4), 81-94.