AI Love You: Exploring the Level of Satisfaction of Using Artificial Intelligence as to Having Romantic Relationship
Main Article Content
Abstract
At this modernity, various applications have been innovated to entertain people and foster romantic connections, with one of the most notable being the increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in romantic relationships. This study, conducted in the Philippines, aims to explore the relationship between relationship satisfaction from using AI in romantic relationships and the level of AI usage, while evaluating its significance in today’s generation. A total of 338 students ranging from Grade 11 to fourth-year college students, participated in this research, which employs a quantitative approach with a descriptive research design. The results revealed that participants were "satisfied" with their relationship satisfaction from using AI (M = 3.71, SD = 0.79), with 67% to 98% agreeing that AI positively influences their romantic relationship satisfaction. The overall AI usage in romantic relationships had a high mean score (M = 3.66, SD = 0.66), suggesting significant engagement with AI in this context. A moderately positive correlation (r = 0.585, p < 0.000, N = 338) was found between AI usage and relationship satisfaction, indicating that as AI usage increases, so does relationship satisfaction, underscoring the role of AI in enhancing emotional aspects of romantic relationships.
Downloads
Article Details
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., Khan, M. M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2023). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1015921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921
Ateeq, A., Milhem, M., Alzoraiki, M., Dawwas, M. I. F., Ali, S. A., & Astal, A., Y. A. (2024) The impact of AI as a mediator on effective communication: enhancing interaction in the digital age. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2024.1467384
Bandinelli, C. (2022). Dating apps: towards post-romantic love in digital societies. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 28(7), 905–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2022.2137157
Bandinelli, C., & Gandini, A. (2022). Dating Apps: The Uncertainty of Marketised Love. Cultural Sociology, 16(3), 423-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755211051559
Chaturvedi, R., Verma, S., Das, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Social companionship with artificial intelligence: Recent trends and future avenues. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122634
Chen, Q., Jing, Y., Gong, Y., & Tan, J. (2025). Will users fall in love with ChatGPT? a perspective from the triangular theory of love. Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, 186(C). DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114982
Cloonan, S., Ault, L., Weihs, K. L., & Lane, R. D. (2024). Development and Preliminary Validation of the Lovebird Scale. Behavioral Sciences, 14(9), 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090747
Darcy, A., Daniels, J., Salinger, D., Wicks, P., & Robinson, A. (2021). Evidence of Human-Level Bonds Established With a Digital Conversational Agent: Cross-sectional, Retrospective Observational Study. JMIR formative research, 5(5), e27868. https://doi.org/10.2196/27868
Havas. (2017). The future of romance: Millennial attitudes towards AI-driven romantic relationships. Havas Group. https://www.havasgroup.com
Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430
Hohenstein, J., Kizilcec, R. F., DiFranzo, D., Aghajari, Z., Mieczkowski, H., Levy, K., Naaman, M., Hancock, J., & Jung, M. F. (2023). Artificial intelligence in communication impacts language and social relationships. Scientific reports, 13(1), 5487. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30938-9
Huang, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Understanding the Continuance Intention for Artificial Intelligence News Anchor: Based on the Expectation Confirmation Theory. Systems, 11(9), 438. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11090438
Jiao, C., Lee, C. T., Feng, Q., & Fincham, F. D. (2024). Romantic relationships and attitudes in Asian emerging adults: Review and critique. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 16(2), 392–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12554
Kolomaznik, M., Petrik, V., Slama, M., & Jurik, V. (2024). The role of socio-emotional attributes in enhancing human-AI collaboration. Frontiers in psychology, 15, 1369957. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369957
Kouros, T., & Papa, V. (2024). Digital Mirrors: AI Companions and the Self. Societies, 14(10), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14100200
Krzywanski, J., Sosnowski, M., Grabowska, K., Zylka, A., Lasek, L., & Kijo-Kleczkowska, A. (2024). Advanced Computational Methods for Modeling, Prediction and Optimization – A Review. Materials, 17(14), 3521. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17143521
Li, H., & Zhang, R. (2024). Finding love in algorithms: deciphering the emotional contexts of close encounters with AI chatbots. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(5), zmae015. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmae015
Liao, . T., Porter, D., & Rodwell, E. (2023). Aartifical love: revolutions in how AI and AR embodied romantic chatbots can move through relationship stages. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2023i0.13446
Liao, T., Rodwell, E., & Porter, D. (2024). Media frames, AI romantic relationships, and the perspectives of people in relationships; mapping and comparing news media themes with user perspectives. Information, Communication & Society, 27(12), 2314–2332. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2420031
Liu, B., Kang, J., & Wei, L. (2024). Artificial intelligence and perceived effort in relationship maintenance: Effects on relationship satisfaction and uncertainty. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 41(5), 1232-1252. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231189899
Montemayor, C., Halpern, J., & Fairweather, A. (2022). In principle obstacles for empathic AI: why we can’t replace human empathy in healthcare. AI & society, 37(4), 1353–1359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01230-z
Mukherjee, S. P., Sinha, B. K., Chattopadhyay A. K. (2018). Statistical Methods in Social Science Research. Springer Singapore
Pugeda, T. G. S., & Aguas, R. B. (2024). Is Artificial Intelligence Capable of Love through Self-Sacrifice? Theology Today, 81(3), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736241280162
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Pres
Shen, J., DiPaola, D., Ali, S., Sap, M., Park, H. W., & Breazeal, C. (2024). Empathy Toward Artificial Intelligence Versus Human Experiences and the Role of Transparency in Mental Health and Social Support Chatbot Design: Comparative Study. JMIR Mental Health, 11, e62679. DOI: 10.2196/62679
Skjuve, M., Følstad, A., Fostervold, K. I., & Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2022). A longitudinal study of human–chatbot relationships. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 168, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102903
Sridevi, G.M., & Suganthi, K. S. (2022). AI-based suitability measurement and prediction between job description and job seeker profiles. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), 100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100109
Strohmann, T., Siemon, D., Khosrawi-Rad, B., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2022). Toward a design theory for virtual companionship. Human–Computer Interaction, 38(3–4), 194–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2022.2084620
Vistorte, A. O. R., Deroncele-Acosta, A., Ayala, J. L. M., Barrasa, A., López-Granero, C., & Martí-González, M. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence to assess emotions in learning environments: a systematic literature review. Frontiers in psychology, 15, 1387089. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1387089
Weber-Guskar, E. (2021). How to feel about emotionalized artificial intelligence? When robot pets, holograms, and chatbots become affective partners. Ethics and Information Technology, 23, 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09598-8
Wu, J. (2024). Social and ethical impact of emotional AI advancement: the rise of pseudo-intimacy relationships and challenges in human interactions. Frontiers in psychology, 15, 1410462. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1410462
Ypsilanti, A. (2024). Speaking on the Way: A Simulation-Based Proposal for Primary-School EFL Learners. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i3.281
Yurt, E. & Kasarci, I. (2024). A Questionnaire of Artificial Intelligence Use Motives: A contribution to investigating the connection between AI and motivation. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(2), 308-325. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.725
Zhao W. (2022). Inspired, but not mimicking: a conversation between artificial intelligence and human intelligence. National science review, 9(6), nwac068. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwac068