AI Love You: Exploring the Level of Satisfaction of Using Artificial Intelligence as to Having Romantic Relationship

Main Article Content

Michelle Angel Saga
Jhemaree Pearl Cabugwason
Maria Isabel Cabusas
Aizee Grace Camilo
Vanessa Daugdaug
Maria Luz Rosales
Kaiser Kate Sacay
Marian Joy Batiancila

Abstract

At this modernity, various applications have been innovated to entertain people and foster romantic connections, with one of the most notable being the increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in romantic relationships. This study, conducted in the Philippines, aims to explore the relationship between relationship satisfaction from using AI in romantic relationships and the level of AI usage, while evaluating its significance in today’s generation. A total of 338 students ranging from Grade 11 to fourth-year college students, participated in this research, which employs a quantitative approach with a descriptive research design. The results revealed that participants were "satisfied" with their relationship satisfaction from using AI (M = 3.71, SD = 0.79), with 67% to 98% agreeing that AI positively influences their romantic relationship satisfaction. The overall AI usage in romantic relationships had a high mean score (M = 3.66, SD = 0.66), suggesting significant engagement with AI in this context. A moderately positive correlation (r = 0.585, p < 0.000, N = 338) was found between AI usage and relationship satisfaction, indicating that as AI usage increases, so does relationship satisfaction, underscoring the role of AI in enhancing emotional aspects of romantic relationships.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Saga, M. A., Cabugwason , J. P., Cabusas , M. I., Camilo, A. G., Daugdaug, V., Rosales, M. L., Sacay, K. K., & Batiancila, M. J. (2025). AI Love You: Exploring the Level of Satisfaction of Using Artificial Intelligence as to Having Romantic Relationship. Journal of Contemporary Philosophical and Anthropological Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.59652/jcpas.v3i1.405
Section
Research Articles
Author Biography

Jhemaree Pearl Cabugwason , University of Mindanao Digos College, Philipinnes

 

 

 

References

Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., Khan, M. M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2023). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1015921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921

Ateeq, A., Milhem, M., Alzoraiki, M., Dawwas, M. I. F., Ali, S. A., & Astal, A., Y. A. (2024) The impact of AI as a mediator on effective communication: enhancing interaction in the digital age. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2024.1467384

Bandinelli, C. (2022). Dating apps: towards post-romantic love in digital societies. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 28(7), 905–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2022.2137157

Bandinelli, C., & Gandini, A. (2022). Dating Apps: The Uncertainty of Marketised Love. Cultural Sociology, 16(3), 423-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755211051559

Chaturvedi, R., Verma, S., Das, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Social companionship with artificial intelligence: Recent trends and future avenues. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122634

Chen, Q., Jing, Y., Gong, Y., & Tan, J. (2025). Will users fall in love with ChatGPT? a perspective from the triangular theory of love. Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, 186(C). DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114982

Cloonan, S., Ault, L., Weihs, K. L., & Lane, R. D. (2024). Development and Preliminary Validation of the Lovebird Scale. Behavioral Sciences, 14(9), 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090747

Darcy, A., Daniels, J., Salinger, D., Wicks, P., & Robinson, A. (2021). Evidence of Human-Level Bonds Established With a Digital Conversational Agent: Cross-sectional, Retrospective Observational Study. JMIR formative research, 5(5), e27868. https://doi.org/10.2196/27868

Havas. (2017). The future of romance: Millennial attitudes towards AI-driven romantic relationships. Havas Group. https://www.havasgroup.com

Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430

Hohenstein, J., Kizilcec, R. F., DiFranzo, D., Aghajari, Z., Mieczkowski, H., Levy, K., Naaman, M., Hancock, J., & Jung, M. F. (2023). Artificial intelligence in communication impacts language and social relationships. Scientific reports, 13(1), 5487. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30938-9

Huang, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Understanding the Continuance Intention for Artificial Intelligence News Anchor: Based on the Expectation Confirmation Theory. Systems, 11(9), 438. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11090438

Jiao, C., Lee, C. T., Feng, Q., & Fincham, F. D. (2024). Romantic relationships and attitudes in Asian emerging adults: Review and critique. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 16(2), 392–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12554

Kolomaznik, M., Petrik, V., Slama, M., & Jurik, V. (2024). The role of socio-emotional attributes in enhancing human-AI collaboration. Frontiers in psychology, 15, 1369957. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369957

Kouros, T., & Papa, V. (2024). Digital Mirrors: AI Companions and the Self. Societies, 14(10), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14100200

Krzywanski, J., Sosnowski, M., Grabowska, K., Zylka, A., Lasek, L., & Kijo-Kleczkowska, A. (2024). Advanced Computational Methods for Modeling, Prediction and Optimization – A Review. Materials, 17(14), 3521. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17143521

Li, H., & Zhang, R. (2024). Finding love in algorithms: deciphering the emotional contexts of close encounters with AI chatbots. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(5), zmae015. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmae015

Liao, . T., Porter, D., & Rodwell, E. (2023). Aartifical love: revolutions in how AI and AR embodied romantic chatbots can move through relationship stages. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2023i0.13446

Liao, T., Rodwell, E., & Porter, D. (2024). Media frames, AI romantic relationships, and the perspectives of people in relationships; mapping and comparing news media themes with user perspectives. Information, Communication & Society, 27(12), 2314–2332. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2420031

Liu, B., Kang, J., & Wei, L. (2024). Artificial intelligence and perceived effort in relationship maintenance: Effects on relationship satisfaction and uncertainty. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 41(5), 1232-1252. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231189899

Montemayor, C., Halpern, J., & Fairweather, A. (2022). In principle obstacles for empathic AI: why we can’t replace human empathy in healthcare. AI & society, 37(4), 1353–1359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01230-z

Mukherjee, S. P., Sinha, B. K., Chattopadhyay A. K. (2018). Statistical Methods in Social Science Research. Springer Singapore

Pugeda, T. G. S., & Aguas, R. B. (2024). Is Artificial Intelligence Capable of Love through Self-Sacrifice? Theology Today, 81(3), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736241280162

Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Pres

Shen, J., DiPaola, D., Ali, S., Sap, M., Park, H. W., & Breazeal, C. (2024). Empathy Toward Artificial Intelligence Versus Human Experiences and the Role of Transparency in Mental Health and Social Support Chatbot Design: Comparative Study. JMIR Mental Health, 11, e62679. DOI: 10.2196/62679

Skjuve, M., Følstad, A., Fostervold, K. I., & Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2022). A longitudinal study of human–chatbot relationships. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 168, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102903

Sridevi, G.M., & Suganthi, K. S. (2022). AI-based suitability measurement and prediction between job description and job seeker profiles. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), 100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100109

Strohmann, T., Siemon, D., Khosrawi-Rad, B., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2022). Toward a design theory for virtual companionship. Human–Computer Interaction, 38(3–4), 194–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2022.2084620

Vistorte, A. O. R., Deroncele-Acosta, A., Ayala, J. L. M., Barrasa, A., López-Granero, C., & Martí-González, M. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence to assess emotions in learning environments: a systematic literature review. Frontiers in psychology, 15, 1387089. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1387089

Weber-Guskar, E. (2021). How to feel about emotionalized artificial intelligence? When robot pets, holograms, and chatbots become affective partners. Ethics and Information Technology, 23, 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09598-8

Wu, J. (2024). Social and ethical impact of emotional AI advancement: the rise of pseudo-intimacy relationships and challenges in human interactions. Frontiers in psychology, 15, 1410462. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1410462

Ypsilanti, A. (2024). Speaking on the Way: A Simulation-Based Proposal for Primary-School EFL Learners. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i3.281

Yurt, E. & Kasarci, I. (2024). A Questionnaire of Artificial Intelligence Use Motives: A contribution to investigating the connection between AI and motivation. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(2), 308-325. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.725

Zhao W. (2022). Inspired, but not mimicking: a conversation between artificial intelligence and human intelligence. National science review, 9(6), nwac068. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwac068