Cartesian Dualism: Bridging Descartes’ Mind-Body Dichotomy to Contemporary Psychology and Mental Health
Article Sidebar
Dimensions.ai Badge
Main Article Content
Abstract
René Descartes’ Cartesian dualism, which separates the mind (res cogitans) and body (res extensa) into two distinct substances, has been a foundational concept in Western philosophy. This dualistic framework has significantly influenced the development of modern psychology and approaches to mental health. However, as contemporary psychology shifts towards more integrative and biopsychosocial models, questions arise regarding the continued relevance of Descartes’ dichotomy. This study explores the philosophical underpinnings of Cartesian dualism and critically examines its influence on the historical and current understanding of mental processes and disorders. By analyzing key developments in psychological theory and mental health practice, the research investigates how Cartesian thinking persists in certain models and is rejected or reinterpreted in others. Additionally, the study evaluates the practical consequences of maintaining a dualistic mindset in therapeutic settings, particularly in cases where psychological and physiological symptoms intersect. The research proposes a framework that bridges classical philosophical insights with contemporary scientific understanding, aiming to promote a more holistic view of the human person in mental health discourse. Ultimately, this study contributes to the ongoing dialogue between philosophy and psychology, advocating for an approach that honors both the distinctiveness and interdependence of mind and body.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alanen, L. (2003). Descartes’ concept of mind. Harvard University Press.
Descartes, R. (2017). Meditations on First Philosophy. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Berrios G. E. (2018). Historical epistemology of the body-mind interaction in psychiatry. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 20(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2018.20.1/gberrios
Brooke, R. (2018). Descartes’ dualism and the phenomenological tradition: a response to Elizabeth Urban’s ‘On matters of mind and body: regarding Descartes’. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 63(5), 656-660. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12450
Brown, D., & Key, B. (2020). Descartes’ dualism of mind and body in the development of psychological thought. In W. E. Pickren (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.486
Burgmer, P., & Forstmann, M. (2018). Mind-body dualism and health revisited: How belief in dualism shapes health behavior. Social Psychology, 49(4), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000344
Correll, J. (2022). Descartes’ Dualism and Its Influence on Our Medical System. SUURJ: Seattle University Undergraduate Research Journal, 6, 11. https://scholarworks.seattleu.edu/suurj/vol6/iss1/11
Curley, E. (2015). Descartes on the mind-body union: a different kind of dualism. In D. Garber, D. Rutherford (eds), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, volume 7. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198748717.003.0003
Serendip. (n.a.). René Descartes and the Legacy of Mind/Body Dualism. https://serendipstudio.org/Mind/Descartes.html
Descartes, R. (1911). The Philosophical Works of Descartes. Cambridge University Press.
Antoine-Mahut, D. (2021). Descartes, René (1596–1650): His Scientific Work and Its Reception. InD. Jalobeanu, C. T. Wolfe (eds), Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_608-1
Grankvist, G., Kajonius, P., & Persson, B. (2016). The relationship between mind-body dualism and personal values. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 8(2), 126-132. DOI:10.5539/ijps.v8n2p126
Hamilton, S., & Hamilton, T. J. (2015). Pedagogical tools to explore Cartesian mind-body dualism in the classroom: Philosophical arguments and neuroscience illusions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1155. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01155
Heinämaa, S., & Kaitaro, T. (2018). Descartes’ notion of the mind–body union and its phenomenological expositions. In D. Zahavi (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Phenomenology (Oxford Handbooks). Oxford University Press.
Kenny, A. (2006). The Rise of Modern Philosophy, Vol. 3. Oxford University Press.
Kirkeben, G. (2001). Descartes Embodied Psychology: Descartes or Damasios Error? Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 10(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1076/jhin.10.2.173.7255
Leitan, N. D., & Murray, G. (2014). The mind–body relationship in psychotherapy: Grounded cognition as an explanatory framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 472. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00472
Mehta N. (2011). Mind-body Dualism: A critique from a Health Perspective. Mens sana monographs, 9(1), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.77436
Mendie, J. G., & Udofia, S. N. (2018). The Problem of Mind-Body Dichotomy: A Critique of the Cartesian Approach. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 1(2), 97-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/10.5281/zenodo.3463785
Mohammed, A. A. (2012). A Critique of Descartes' Mind-Body Dualism. Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy, 6(1), 95-112. https://www.kritike.org/journal/issue_11/mohammed_june2012.pdf
Nath, S. (2013). Ryle as a critique of Descartes’ Mind-Body Dualism. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(7), 1-5. https://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0713.php?rp=P191513
Raese, J. (2015). The pernicious effect of mind/body dualism in psychiatry. Journal of Psychiatry, 18, 1-7.
Urban E. (2018). On matters of mind and body: regarding Descartes. The Journal of analytical psychology, 63(2), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12395
Boeri, M. D. (2018). Plato and Aristotle On What Is Common to Soul and Body. Some Remarks on a Complicated Issue. In M. D. Boeri, Y. Y. Kanayama, J. Mittelmann (eds), Soul and Mind in Greek Thought. Psychological Issues in Plato and Aristotle. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78547-9_8
Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Barnes and Noble, Inc.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. París: Gallimard
DeRubeis, R. J., Hollon, S. D., Amsterdam, J. D., Shelton, R. C., Young, P. R., Salomon, R. M., …Gallop, R. (2005). Cognitive therapy vs medications in the treatment of moderate to severe depression. Archives of general psychiatry, 62(4), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.409
Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science (New York, N.Y.), 316(5827), 1002–1005. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136930
Vinci, T. (2008). Mind–Body Causation, Mind–Body Union and the ‘Special Mode of Thinking’ in Descartes. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 16(3), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608780802200414