Exploring Gender Disparities In Executive Leadership Positions In Norway: A Qualitative Analysis

Main Article Content

Nelufer Nazrul

Abstract

Norway has gained global reputation for its gender equality efforts, yet a considerable gender disparity persists at the highest organizational ranks. This qualitative study explores the underlying reasons for the underrepresentation of women in executive leadership positions in Norway. Grounded in social role theory and the glass ceiling concept, the research involved a comprehensive literature review of academic journals, government reports, and industry publications. Thematic analysis revealed societal and cultural norms, organizational factors, and individual-level elements as key contributors to this inequality. Traditional gender roles, implicit biases, lack of mentorship and networks, gender culture, structural bias, as well as personal factors like confidence, self-esteem, and risk aversion emerged as significant barriers. The study critically evaluates existing measures aimed at bridging the gender gap, which have had limited long-term impact. Based on the findings, an integrated set of recommendations is proposed for policymakers, organizations, and individuals to increase women's representation in top executive roles. These include challenging traditions, fostering organizational inclusivity, providing individual support, strengthening accountability, and promoting collaborative efforts.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nazrul, N. (2024). Exploring Gender Disparities In Executive Leadership Positions In Norway: A Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Economics, Innovative Management and Entrepreneurship, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.59652/jeime.v2i2.234
Section
Research Article

References

Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139-158.

Benschop, Y., & Doorewaard, H. (1998). Covered by equality: The gender subtext of organizations. Organization Studies, 19(5), 787-805. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069801900504

Bertrand, M. (2011). New perspectives on gender. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4, pp. 1543-1590). Elsevier.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Catalyst. (n.d.). Pyramids: Women in S&P 500 companies. https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-sp-500-companies/

Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691-1730.

Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448-474.

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Erlbaum.

Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 62-71.

Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.

Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 474-493.

Ely, R. J., Stone, P., & Ammerman, C. (2014). Rethink what you ‘know’ about high-achieving women. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2014/12/rethink-what-you-know-about-high-achieving-women

Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657-674.

Hunt, V., Layton, D., & Prince, S. (2015). Why diversity matters. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/why-diversity-matters

Hymowitz, C., & Schellhardt, T. D. (1986). The glass ceiling: Why women can’t seem to break the invisible barrier that blocks them from the top jobs. The Wall Street Journal, 57, 1-4.

Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56-87.

Ibarra, H., Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2010). Why men still get more promotions than women. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2010/09/why-men-still-get-more-promotions-than-women

Lyness, K. S., & Thompson, D. E. (2000). Climbing the corporate ladder: Do female and male executives follow the same route? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 86-101.

McGinn, K. L., & Castro, M. R. (2021). Why did so many wives leave the labor force? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/09/why-did-so-many-wives-leave-the-labor-force

Morrison, A. M., White, R. P., & Van Velsor, E. (1987). Breaking the glass ceiling: Can women reach the top of America’s largest corporations? Addison-Wesley.

Norwegian Institute of Public Health. (n.d.). Gender equality in Norway: Trends and challenges. https://www.fhi.no/en/publ/2022/gender-equality-in-norway/

Norwegian School of Economics. (n.d.). Work-life balance and career advancement: Experiences of women in Norway. https://www.nhh.no/en/research-centres/gender-equality-in-business/

Oakley, J. G. (2000). Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: Understanding the scarcity of female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 321-334.

Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743-762. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239

Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00235

Seierstad, C., & Opsahl, T. (2011). For the few not the many? The effects of affirmative action on presence, prominence, and social capital of women directors in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(1), 44-54.

Storvik, A., & Schøne, P. (2008). In search of the glass ceiling: Gender and recruitment to management in Norway’s state bureaucracy. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(3), 729-755.

Teigen, M. (2012). Gender quotas on corporate boards: On the diffusion of a distinct national policy reform. Comparative Social Research, 29, 115-146.

World Economic Forum. (2022). Global gender gap report 2022. https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2022