Philosophical conceptualization of knowledge potential in the context of sustainable society development
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article explores the philosophical underpinnings of knowledge potential and its profound implications for the development of sustainable societies. Drawing on the rich tradition of philosophical inquiry, the paper delves into the dynamic nature of knowledge, viewing it not merely as a repository of facts but as a transformative force capable of shaping the trajectory of societies. Philosophers have long argued that knowledge is a catalyst for societal progress, driving innovation, social equity, and environmental responsibility. Through a multidimensional lens, the article examines the role of knowledge in addressing contemporary global challenges, including climate change, resource depletion, and social inequities. It highlights the importance of accessible education, interdisciplinary collaboration, and ethical knowledge dissemination in harnessing the full potential of knowledge for sustainability. Furthermore, the philosophical perspective underscores the ethical imperative of responsible knowledge use and the promotion of a culture of lifelong learning. The article contends that the philosophical conceptualization of knowledge potential offers a compelling framework for envisioning and building sustainable societies. By recognizing knowledge as a dynamic and transformative force, societies can chart a path toward a future characterized by environmental stewardship, social justice, and collective well-being.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Anatska, N., & Svidlo, T. (2022). The main values of ethical and philosophical principles of critical rationalism. Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, 1(1), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2022.1.1.10
Apostolidou, A. (2022). Digitally situated knowledge: Connectivism, anthropology and epistemological pluralism. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 102047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102047
Bencsik, A. (2022). Background on the Sustainability of Knowledge. Sustainability, 14(15), 9698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159698
Bird, A. (2010). Social knowledge: the social sense of “scientific knowledge”. Philosophical Perspectives, 24, 23–56. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41329438
Breil, S. M., Mielke, I., Ahrens, H., Geldmacher, T., Sensmeier, J., Marschall, B., & Back, M. D. (2022). Predicting Actual Social Skill Expression from Personality and Skill Self-Concepts. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030048
Burks, V. S., Laird, R. D., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Knowledge Structures, Social Information Processing, and Children's Aggressive Behavior. Social Development, 8(2), 220-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00092
Castellacci, F. (2022). Innovation and social welfare: A new research agenda. Journal of Economic Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12537
Colnar, S., Dimovski, V., & Bogataj, D. (2019). Knowledge Management and the Sustainable Development of Social Work. Sustainability, 11(22), 6374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226374
Dépelteau, F. (2018). Relational Thinking in Sociology: Relevance, Concurrence and Dissonance. In Dépelteau, F. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9_1
Dietrich, F., & Spiekermann, K. (2021). Social Epistemology. In M. Knauff & W. Spohn (eds). The Handbook of Rationality (pp.579-590). The MIT Press. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02431971
Dohn, N. B. (2011). Roles of epistemiology in investigating knowledge: “Philosophizing with”. Metaphilosophy, 42(4), 431–450. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24439926
Fabian, J. (2012). Cultural anthropology and the question of knowledge. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18(2), 439–453. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41507968
Feest, U., & Sturm, T. (2011). What (Good) is Historical Epistemology? Editors’ Introduction. Erkenntnis, 75(3), 285–302. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476725
Filho, W. L., Fritzen, B., Vargas, V. R., Paço, A., Zhang, Q., Doni, F. …Wu, Y. J.(2022) Social innovation for sustainable development: assessing current trends. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(4), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.2013974
Francisco Junior, F. W. E., & Yamashita, M. (2018). Traditional Knowledge as a Tool for Discussing History and Philosophy of Science in Teacher Education. Creative Education, 9, 567-574. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.94040
Freidson, E. (1986). Knowledge and the Practice of Sociology. Sociological Forum, 1(4), 684–700. http://www.jstor.org/stable/684597
Frolichs, K. M. M., Rosenblau, G., & Korn, C.W. (2022). Incorporating social knowledge structures into computational models. Nature Communications, 13, 6205. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33418-2
Hair, N., Akdevelioglu, D., & Clark, M. (2023). The philosophical and methodological guidelines for ethical online ethnography. International Journal of Market Research, 65(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853221137459
Hamati-Ataya, I. (2018). The Sociology of Knowledge as Postphilosophical Epistemology: Out of IR’s “Socially Constructed” Idealism. International Studies Review, 20(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix028
Heil, R. (2023). Knowledge and acceptance. Asian Journal of Philosophy, 2, 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-023-00078-y
Kijek, T., Kijek, A., Matras-Bolibok, A. (2023). Innovation and Regional Development. In Innovation and Regional Technological Convergence. SpringerBriefs in Regional Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24531-2_2
Lee, C. B. (2010). Generating Synergy between Conceptual Change and Knowledge Building. Human Development, 53(3), 134–152. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26764954
Leiter, B. (2001). Prospects and Problems for the Social Epistemology of Evidence Law. Philosophical Topics, 29(1/2), 319–332. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43154368
Liu, D., & Zhu, Y. P. (2022). Evolution of Knowledge Structure in an Emerging Field Based on a Triple Helix Model: the Case of Smart Factory. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01073-z
Lotan, N., & Minkov, E. (2023). Social world knowledge: Modeling and applications. PLoS ONE, 18(7), e0283700. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283700
Maciag, R. (2022). Theory of Knowledge Based on the Idea of the Discursive Space. Philosophies, 7(4), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7040072
Melchior, G. (2023). The Value of Knowledge and Other Epistemic Standings: A Case for Epistemic Pluralism. Philosophia, 51, 1829–1847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-023-00647-8
Mohan, B.A. (2007). Knowledge Structures in Social Practices. In Cummins, J., Davison, C. (eds) International Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_22
Olsson, E. J. (2022). Explicationist Epistemology and the Explanatory Role of Knowledge. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 53, 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09520-8
Pape, M., Schoch, L., Akilah, C.-F. (2023). Editorial: Thinking and doing intersectionality in sociology of sport. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1212457
Poovey, M. (1999). From New Historicism to Historical Epistemology. Journal of Victorian Culture, 4(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/13555509909505984
Popper, K. (1985). Evolutionary Epistemology. In Tarozzi, G., van der Merwe, A. (eds) Open Questions in Quantum Physics. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5245-4_27
Pyka, A., & Prettner, K. (2018). Economic Growth, Development, and Innovation: The Transformation Towards a Knowledge-Based Bioeconomy. In Lewandowski, I. (eds) Bioeconomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_11
Rimkutė, A. (2004). The Problem of Social Knowledge in Contemporary Social Epistemology: Two Approaches. Problemos, 65, 4-19. https://doi.org/10.15388/Problemos.2004.65.6645
Salas-Zapata, W., Ríos-Osorio, L., & Cardona-Arias, J.(2018).Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Sustainability: Systematic Review 1990–2016. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability,20(1), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0003
Satar, M. S., Aggarwal, D., Bansal, R., & Alarifi, G. (2023). Mapping the Knowledge Structure and Unveiling the Research Trends in Social Entrepreneurship and Inclusive Development: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 15(7), 5626. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075626
Schertz, K. E., & Berman, M. G. (2019). Understanding Nature and Its Cognitive Benefits. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419854100
Smith, R. (2023). Forms of knowledge and forms of philosophy. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 57(1), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad007
Tulin, M., Lancee, B., & Volker, B. (2018). Personality and Social Capital. Social Psychology Quarterly, 81(4), 295–318. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48588648
Turyahikayo, E. (2021). Philosophical paradigms as the bases for knowledge management research and practice. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 13(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.012
Xiao, W., Kong, H., Shi, L., Boamah, V., & Tang, D. (2022). The Impact of Innovation-Driven Strategy on High-Quality Economic Development: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(7), 4212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074212
Young, M. (2020). Knowledge and the Sociology of Education. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 44, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.15388/ActPaed.44.1