The Impact of Problem Based Learning on Teaching the Aspect of Audience in ESP Writing

Main Article Content

Ivana Martinovic-Barbul

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to test the influence of problem-based learning (PBL) on the teaching of students’ writing skills in English for specific purposes (ESP). There is very little research available that deal with specific aspects of writing, global and local, and their connections with the teaching method because researchers generally only test overall improvement of writing skills. According to the stated problem, goals and tasks, the research was performed by causal method – experiment with parallel groups. The experimental (treatment) group learned about the basic features of business writing according to pre-planned PBL teaching units. The same content was also taught in the control group by lecturing and illustrative teaching methods. Given the results, we can see that the experimental group had more pronounced trait score 2 for the aspect audience at the initial measurement, experimental group had more pronounced feature of score 4 at the final measurement. Student papers on the final measurement are fully compliant with audience, their status and relationship with the writer; i.e. tone, word choice, document type fully correspond to a given audience with the appropriate level of formality for a given audience. The results of t test for paired samples indicate that learning through problem solving is very useful if you want to develop aspect of audience in ESP writing as it encourages the development of higher-order intellectual skills and creative thinking, which are related to the global aspects of writing.

Article Details

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Martinovic-Barbul, I. (2026). The Impact of Problem Based Learning on Teaching the Aspect of Audience in ESP Writing. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.59652/58kj9n77

References

Basturkmen, H. (2006). Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617040

Belcher, D. D. (2004). 8. Trends in Teaching English for Specific Purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 165-186. DOI:10.1017/S026719050400008X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719050400008X

Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/358302

Breuch, L.-A. M. K. (2002). Post-Process “Pedagogy”: A Philosophical Exercise. JAC, 22(1), 119-150.

Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Davidson, B. W. (1998). Comments on Dwight Atkinson’s “A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL”: A Case for Critical Thinking in the English Language Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587906

De Grave, W. S., Dolmans, D. H., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (1999). Profiles of effective tutors in problem-based learning: scaffolding student learning. Medical education, 33(12), 901-906. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00492.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00492.x

Evensen, D. H., & Hmelo, C. E. (Eds.). (2000). Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604989

Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2005). Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611505

Freedman, A. (1993). Show and tell? The role of explicit teaching in the learning of new genres. Research in the Teaching of English, 27(3), 222-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/rte199315402

Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-Based Pedagogies: A Social Response to Process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23927

Jones, K. (1982). Simulations in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Rollinson, P. (2005). Using Peer Feedback in the ESL Writing Class. ELT Journal, 59, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci003

Sidenko, A. S. (2006). On innovative and traditional teaching models. Nastava i vaspitanje, 55(2), 109-121.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997