The Role of Thinking-in-Action Pedagogy in Enhancing Scientific Inquiry and Conceptual Understanding in Integrated Science
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Developing students’ scientific inquiry skills requires instructional approaches that make thinking explicit and connect conceptual knowledge with authentic practice. This action research examined the effectiveness of thinking-in-action pedagogy in fostering scientific inquiry and bridging theory and practice in Integrated Science instruction through the use of visible thinking routines. The study involved 60 Grade 7 students from Philippine Science High School-Western Visayas Campus during the 2022-2023 school year and employed a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design with matched pairs based on prior academic performance. Results from a validated researcher-made instrument revealed no significant difference in pretest scores between the control and experimental groups, indicating comparable baseline understanding. However, posttest results showed a significant improvement in the experimental group exposed to the thinking-in-action pedagogy. Students demonstrated enhanced conceptual understanding, problem-solving, reasoning, and reflective thinking skills, suggesting that making thinking visible supports deeper learning and effective integration of theory and practice. The findings provide evidence that integrating structured thinking routines in science instruction promotes active learning, critical thinking, and meaningful engagement, aligning with Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education).
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications Ltd.
Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2021). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning Evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 489-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0
Jarbulova, K., & Abdezimova, L. (2025). Develop Metacognitive Skills through Visible Thinking Routines: Empowering students for Reflective and Independent Inquiry-based-Learning. In ECER 2025. European Educational Research Association. https://eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/30/contribution/61661
Gholam, A. (2024). Student engagement through visual thinking routines: Attitudes and classroom experiences. Athens Journal Education, 5(2), 161-172. DOI: 10.30958/aje.5-2-4
Guenther, J., & Abbott, M. (2024). Think-Pair-Share: Promoting Equitable Participation and In-Depth Discussion. PRiMER, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2024.444143
Li, M.-M., & Tu, C.-C. (2024). Developing a Project-Based Learning Course Model Combined with the Think-Pair-Share Strategy to Enhance Creative Thinking Skills in Education Students. Education Sciences, 14(3), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030233
Ramos-Vallecillo, N., Murillo-Ligorred, V., & Lozano-Blasco, R. (2024). University Students’ Achievement of Meaningful Learning through Participation in Thinking Routines. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(4), 1012-1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14040066
Project Zero. (2024). PZ’s Thinking Routines Toolbox. Harvard Graduate School of Education. https://pz.harvard.edu/thinking-routines
Project Zero. (2025). Visible Thinking. Harvard Graduate School of Education. https://pz.harvard.edu/projects/visible-thinking
Ritchhart, R. (2020). Cultures of thinking in action: 10 mindsets to transform our teaching and students’ learning. Jossey-Bass.
Ritchhart, R., & Church, M. (2020). Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. Jossey-Bass.
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J. & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
The University of Chicago Center for Teaching and Learning. (2025). Make learning visible with thinking routines. https://teaching.uchicago.edu/resources/make-learning-visible-thinking-routines
United Nations. (2023). Sustainable Development Goal 4: Quality education. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/education/
Arifin, Z., Sukarmin, Saputro, S., & Kamari, A. (2025). The effect of inquiry-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills in science education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), em2592. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15988
Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2022). Metacognition and teaching higher order thinking (HOT) in science education: Students’ learning, teachers’ knowledge and instructional practices. In R. Wegerif, L. Li, J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking. Routledge.