Multimodal Thinking Spaces: A Qualitative Study of Interactive Science Notebook and Conceptual Understanding in Grade 10 Biology

Main Article Content

Joey Elechicon

Abstract

Interactive science notebooks (ISNs) have gained renewed attention as multimodal spaces where learners record ideas, construct representations, and reflect on their understanding of science concepts. This article investigated how ISNs influence Grade 10 learners’ conceptual understanding in a Philippine public secondary school. Drawing on focus group discussion and notebook artifacts from twenty-five (25) students who used an interactive science notebook over four weeks of biology instruction, the study employed narrative-thematic analysis to examine learners’ experiences. Four interrelated themes emerged: (1) conceptualizing through arts and crafts, as learners used drawings, foldables, and color-coding to make abstract biological concepts more concrete; (2) systematizing notes leading to mastery, where structured layouts, guidelines, and page organization helped learners track ideas and review efficiently; (3) note-taking and referencing strategies, as students developed personal conventions for summarizing, paraphrasing, and linking new content with prior lessons; and (4) engagement through interactive learning, where the notebook functioned as a personal learning space that sustained attention, enjoyment, and participation during biology lessons. These findings illuminate the mechanisms by which ISNs support conceptual understanding, not only as the conventional notebook, but as cognitive, metacognitive, and affective tools. The articles discusses implications for Philippine science teachers seeking to design notebook-based activities that foreground meaning-making, and calls for further research on digital and hybrid notebook formats.

Article Details

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Elechicon, J. (2025). Multimodal Thinking Spaces: A Qualitative Study of Interactive Science Notebook and Conceptual Understanding in Grade 10 Biology. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.59652/dznz5r28

References

Adhikari, C. M. (2025). Contribution of Effective Notetaking in Learning Undergraduate-Level Introductory Physics Courses. Journal of Nepal Physical Society, 11(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.3126/jnphyssoc.v11i1.87418

Amanova, A. K., Butabayeva, L. A., Abayeva, G. A., Umirbekova, A. N., Abildina, S. K., & Makhmetova, A. A. (2025). A systematic review of the implementation of STEAM education in schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(1), em2568. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15894

Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2023). Flipped classroom in higher education: a systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00430-5

Bouchrika, I. (2025,). Digital Notes vs Paper Notes for 2025: Benefits of Taking Notes by Hand. Research.com. https://research.com/education/digital-notes-vs-paper-notes

Carroll, K. (2024). The Relationship Between Note taking, Revision, and Learning in Tertiary Education: A Review of Literature. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 16(1), 1-20. https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/781/1111

Chen, F. Z., Chen, L. A., Tseng, C. C., Pai, C. H., Tsai, K.-E., Liang, E.-C., …Chen, C.-W. (2025). Enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes in life sciences: implementing interactive learning environments and flipped classroom models. Discover Educa-tion, 4, 102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00501-x

Constantia, C., Christos, P., Glykeria, R., Anastasia, A. R., & Aikaterini, V. (2023). The Impact of COVID-19 on the Educational Process: The Role of the School Principal. Journal of education (Boston, Mass.), 203(3), 566-573. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211032588

Cubio, R. R., & Yusico, E. M. (2025). Enhancing academic performance through a combined note taking strategy in science instruction. International Journal of Advanced Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 11(1), 592-596.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Demelash, M., Andargie, D., & Belachew, W. (2024). Enhancing secondary school students’ engagement in chemistry through 7E con-text-based instructional strategy supported with simulation. Pedagogical Research, 9(2), em0189. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14146

Elechicon, J. E., & Paris, P. E. D. (2024). Developing Students’ Conceptual Understanding Using Interactive Notebook: A Qua-si-Experimental Study. WVSU Research Journal, 12(1), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.59460/wvsurjvol12iss1pp38-50

Fajardo, M. T. M., Bacarrissas, P. G., & Castro, H. G. (2019). The Effects of Interactive Science Notebook on Student Teachers’ Achievement, Study Habits, Test Anxiety, and Attitudes towards Physics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 62-76. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/211/166

Jaladanki, V. S., & Bhattacharya, K. (2014). Exercising Autonomous Learning Approaches through Interactive Notebooks: A Qualitative Case Study. The Qualitative Report, 19(27), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1208

Kitjaroonchai, N., Marshall, P., Phasook, J., & Thararuenroeng, N. (2025). University students’ perceptions on Note-Taking and its impact on academic performance. Journal of English Teaching, 11(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v11i1.6373

Mallaevna, O. N. (2025). Interactive Lessons and Flipped Classroom. Excellencia: International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 3(2), 104-107. https://www.multijournals.org/index.php/excellencia-imje/article/view/3078/3536

Mengesha, A. K., Ayele, H. S., Misker, M. F., & Beyna, A. T. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of flipped classroom teaching-learning method among undergraduate medical students at gondar university, college of medicine and health sciences: an interventional study. BMC Medical Education, 24, 1108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06105-7

Mollet, A. A. (2017). Science Interactive Notebooks: A case study on learning in high school students [Thesis, Hamline University]. School of Education and Leadership Student Capstone Theses and Dissertations. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/4367

Namukasa, S. (2024). Integrating Arts into Science Curriculum for Holistic Education. Research Invention Journal of Research in Education, 4(3), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.59298/RIJRE/2024/433741

Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318

Özbay, Ö., & Çınar, S. (2021). Effectiveness of flipped classroom teaching models in nursing education: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 102, 104922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104922

Plecis, P. J., & Cheung, M. M. (2025). Flipped classroom approach in teaching science in senior high school. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(5), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.105

Rahmatika, N., Hanapi, M. H. B. M., Jendriadi, J., Sariasih, Y., Imami, M. K. W., & Uslan. (2024). The Impact of flipped learning on Students` critical Thinking; A Systematic literature review. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 23(10), 180-206. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.10.9

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Salame, I. I., Tuba, M., & Nujhat, M. (2024). Note-taking and its impact on learning, academic performance, and memory. International Journal of Instruction, 17(3), 599-616. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17333a

Tupas, F., & Matsuura, T. (2020). Integrating arts in the basic science curriculum: In the context of local marine resources in the Visayan sea. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 13(11), 1248-1258. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/v13i11.149967_2020

van Vliet, E. A., Winnips, J. C., & Brouwer, N. (2015). Flipped-Class pedagogy enhances student metacognition and Collabora-tive-Learning strategies in higher education but effect does not persist. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 14(3), ar26. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-09-0141

Wilson, K. E. (2015). The impact of interactive science notebooks on middle school students [Master’s thesis]. California State University. https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/cf95jc16t

Yıldız, E., Doğan, U., Özbay, Ö., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2022). Flipped classroom in higher education: An investigation of instructor per-ceptions through the lens of TPACK. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 10757-10783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11059-8

Yunzal, A. J., Rallos, A. G., Nanud, M. N., Ondoy, M. L., Ares, J. M., & Picardal, M. (2024). Exploring Active Learning Strategies in Science among Senior High School STEM Learners and Teachers. Science Education International, 35(4), 369-381. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v35.i4.8