Artificial Intelligence in Physics Classrooms: Comparative Perspectives on ChatGPT and DeepSeek as Learning Supports
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study presents a conceptual comparative analysis of two advanced AI-driven platforms, ChatGPT and DeepSeek, within the context of physics education. It explores how these systems can serve as complementary learning supports that enhance conceptual understanding, inquiry, and problem-solving in classroom settings. ChatGPT’s dialogic and adaptive interaction style fosters exploratory learning, metacognitive reflection, and conceptual clarification, aligning well with constructivist and inquiry-based pedagogies. In contrast, DeepSeek’s precision-oriented architecture and iterative refinement processes lend themselves to structured problem-solving and cognitive efficiency, supporting students in procedural and computational tasks. Together, these affordances illustrate how distinct AI designs can address different dimensions of physics learning. The analysis also examines emerging ethical and pedagogical challenges, including issues of academic integrity, cognitive dependency, and algorithmic bias, underscoring the importance of teacher mediation and institutional regulation. The study concludes that, when thoughtfully integrated, AI tools like ChatGPT and DeepSeek can enrich physics education by balancing conceptual exploration with procedural rigor, while emphasizing the need for ethical literacy and transparent frameworks in their classroom use.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). “Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending Bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922-948. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610-623). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6-11.
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005
Garzón, J., Patiño, E., & Marulanda, C. (2025). Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Trends, Benefits, and Challenges. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(8), Article 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9080084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9080084
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Children development and education in Japan (pp. 262-272). New York: Freeman
Holmes, W., Porayska Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2022). Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a community wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 504-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
Jiang, Q., Gao, Z., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2025). DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT vs. Claude: A comparative study for scientific computing and scientific machine learning tasks. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 15(3), 100583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2025.100583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2025.100583
Kotsis, K. T. (2025a). ChatGPT and DeepSeek Evaluate One Another for Science Education. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v3i1.439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v3i1.439
Kotsis, K. T. (2025b). Comparing ChatGPT and DeepSeek in Addressing Misconceptions about Physics Concepts. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 3(2), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2025.3(2).17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2025.3(2).17
Kotsis, K. T. (2025c). ChatGPT and DeepSeek in physics education: A narrative and thematic literature review of pedagogical implica-tions. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 5(5), 1080-1086. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049X.2025.5.5.5074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049X.2025.5.5.5074
Luckin, R. (2025). Nurturing human intelligence in the age of AI: rethinking education for the future. Development and Learning in Organ-izations: An International Journal, 39(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-04-2024-0108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-04-2024-0108
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson.
Madaan, A., Tandon, N., Gupta, P., Hallinan, S., Gao, L., Wiegreffe, S., ... & Clark, P. (2023). Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17651
Madupati, B., Jonnalagadda, A. K., & Madupathi, S. (2025). A Technical Comparison of ChatGPT and DeepSeek: Architecture, Efficiency, and Performance. International Journal of Global Innovations and Solutions. https://doi.org/10.21428/e90189c8.65f53287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21428/e90189c8.65f53287
Manik, M. M. H. (2025). ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek: A comparative study on AI-based code generation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.18467
OpenAI. (2023). GPT 4 technical report. arXiv. https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf
Park, C. (2003). In Other (People’s) Words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-488. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301677
Regan, P. M., & Jesse, J. (2019). Ethical challenges of edtech, big data, and personalized learning: Twenty first century student sorting and tracking. Ethics and Information Technology, 21, 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9492-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9492-2
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333, 776-778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
Treagust, D. F., & Tsui, C. Y. (Eds.). (2013). Multiple representations in biological education. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8
Valle-Muñoz, V. M., Mendoza-Muñoz, M., & Villa-González, E. (2025). Physical Literacy as a Pedagogical Model in Physical Education. Children, 12(8), Article 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12081008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children12081008
von Eschenbach, W. J. (2021). Transparency and the black box problem: Why we do not trust AI. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 1607-1622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0