Fostering Inclusivity in Christian Education: Queer-Womanist Pedagogical Practices
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Traditional doctrines and patriarchal structures within Christian education often constrain discussions on gender and sexuality, limiting the inclusive expression of faith identity. Grounded in feminist and queer pedagogical theories, this study addresses how faith communities can translate progressive, inclusive theology into active educational practices to challenge heteronormative exclusion. Utilizing a qualitative grounded theory research design following the Corbin and Strauss model, data were gathered from a purposive sample of 18 informants, comprising 10 Christian Youth Fellowship (CYF) students and 8 Christian educators at the United Church of Christ in the Philippines (UCCP)-Ekklesia in Mandurriao, Iloilo City. Data collection involved semi-structured in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, field notes, and memoing journals. The emergent findings reveal four primary thematic constructs: teaching inclusivity (by presenting queer ideas and mainstreaming marginalized voices), addressing gender roles (through gender-neutral divine language and SOGIE dialogues), facilitating faith sharing (by personalizing biblical narratives), and navigating persistent structural and theological barriers to full acceptance. The study concludes that intentionally combining queer-affirming and womanist perspectives can foster deeply transformative and equitable learning environments; however, moving from mere tolerance to radical acceptance remains an ongoing process that relies heavily on active pastoral engagement, progressive leadership, and deliberate pedagogical intervention.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews. In K. E. Newcomer, H. P. Hatry, and J. S. Wholey (eds), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19
Anderson, D. W. (2010). Biblical Justice and Inclusive Education. Journal of Religion, Disability & Health, 14(4), 338-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228967.2010.517428
Arivia, G. (2016). Feminist pedagogy: Deconstructing patriarchal culture (20 years reflection of activism inside and outside of classroom). Jurnal Perempuan, 21(3), 231-239.
Bhowmik, T. (2025). Reimagining education: Feminist and queer pedagogies. Emerging Paradigms in Contemporary Education: Bridging Phi-losophy, Policy, and Practice. https://doi.org/10.25215/1257878980.14
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of Qualitative Research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Darder, A., Baltodano, M. P., & Torres, R. D. (2003). Critical Pedagogy: An Introduction. In A. Darder, M. P. Baltodano, and T. D. Rodolfo (Eds.), The Critical Pedagogy Reader. Routledge.
Destari, D., Hanim, S. A., & Istiarsyah. (2025). Exploring the evolution of queer pedagogy research: A bibliometric study of inclusive education. Eastasouth Journal of Learning and Educations, 3(2), 141-151.
Epping, C. (2022). Introducing queer theology. In School of Theology Seminar Papers. College of Saint Benedict; Saint John’s University.
Gaskell, J. (1984). Gender and course choice: The Orientation of Male and Female Students. The Journal of Education, 166(1), 89-102.
Hamill, J. (2025). Queera Personalis: Theorizing a Queer Ignatian Pedagogical Paradigm in First-Year Writing. Jesuit Higher Education: A Journal, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.15365/2164-7666.1490
Jaropillo, A.C. (2017). An Analysis of the United Church of Christ in the Philippines General Assembly Policy Statement on Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals and Transgender: Its Implications and Significance to the Western Visayas Conference [master’s thesis]. Iloilo City: Central Philippine University.
Kieser, D., & Parsons, J. (2013). Characteristics of Christian pedagogy. Christian Teachers Journal, 21(4), 16-20.
Lin, C. K. (2017). Changing the Shape of the Landscape: Sexual Diversity Frameworks and the Promise of Queer Literacy Pedagogy in the Elementary Classroom. Occasional Paper Series, 37. https://doi.org/10.58295/2375-3668.1100
Mohajan, D., & Mohajan, H. K. (2022). Memo writing procedures in grounded theory research methodology. Studies in Social Science & Humanities, 1(4), 10-18. https://doi.org/ 10.56397/SSSH.2022.11.02
National Council of Churches in the Philippines. (2017). Perspectives on LGBTQIA: An Ecumenical Perspective. https://nccphilippines.org/2017/06/22/perspectives-on-lgbtqia-an-ecumenical-perspective/
Nemi Neto, J. (2018). Queer pedagogy: Approaches to inclusive teaching. Policy Futures in Education, 16(5), 589-604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317751273
Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research: Context and Conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381-388. DOI: 10.1177/1049732317697102
Prill, P. E. (2016). Promoting the inclusion of LGBTQ+ students: The role of the honors college in faith-based colleges and universities. In R. Badenhausen (ed.), Honors Colleges in the 21st Century. National Collegiate Honors Council.
Slater, J., & Cornwall, S. (2022). Queer Theology. In B. N. Wolfe (ed.), St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology. University of St Andrews. https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/QueerTheology
Stough, L. M., & Lee, S. (2021). Grounded Theory Approaches Used in Educational Research Journals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211052203
Stratton, S. J. (2024). Purposeful Sampling: Advantages and Pitfalls. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 39(2), 121-122. doi:10.1017/S1049023X24000281
Zacharia, B., Pai, P. K., & Paul, M. (2021). Focus Group Discussion as a Tool to Assess Patient-Based Outcomes, Practical Tips for Conducting Focus Group Discussion for Medical Students – Learning With an Example. Journal of Patient Experience, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735211034276