Research on kindergarten and primary school students’ magnetic misconceptions and how to plan educational activities
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Because magnetism is such an abstract and complicated subject, it can be challenging for children to comprehend at times. Magnetism is a subject that youngsters find to be really exciting. The topic of magnetism is one that children find to be both fascinating and fascinating. There has not been nearly as much research done on how children perceive magnetism as there has been on other natural phenomena. This is even though youngsters consider magnetism to be something that is exciting. Despite the fact that children perceive magnetism to be more attractive than other natural phenomena, this is the case. This particular piece of research is regarded as an important piece of re-search owing to the fact that it has an impact on the way in which learning is experienced. The goal of this study is to analyze the misconceptions that are held by children who are enrolled in elementary school. The research will be conducted with the intention of providing teachers with a theoretical framework upon which they can construct educational activities that are relevant to the requirements of primary school pupils. The ability to construct educational activities that are pertinent to the requirements of elementary school kids will be made possible as a result of this innovation.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Afra, N. C., Osta, I., & Zoubeir, W. (2009). Students’ alternative concepts about electricity and the effect of inquiry-based teaching strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 103-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9106-7
Bagno, Ε., & Eylon, B.S. (1997). From problem solving to a knowledge structure: An example from the domain of electromagnetism. Journal of Physics, 65, 726–736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18642
Bailey, J., Francis, R.G., & Hill, D.M. (1987). Exploring ideas about magnets. Research in Science Education, 17, 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357178
Bar, V., & Zinn B. (1998). Similar frameworks of action-at-a-distance: Early scientists’ and pupils’ ideas. Science and Education, 7, 471-498. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008687204309
Bar. V., Zinn B., & Rubin, E. (1997). Children’s ideas about action at a distance. International Journal of Science Education, 19(10), 1137-1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970191003
Barrow, L. H. (1987). Magnet Concepts and Elementary Students’ Misconceptions. In J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (pp. 17-22). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Barrow, L. H. (2000). Do elementary science methods textbooks facilitate the understanding of magnet concepts? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(3), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009487432316
Bonawitz, E., Ullman, T. D., Bridgers, S., Gopnik, A., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2019). Sticking to the Evidence? A Behavioral and Compu-tational Case Study of Micro-Theory Change in the Domain of Magnetism. Cognitive science, 43(8), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12765
Borges, A. T., & Gilbert, J. K. (1998). Models of magnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 361–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200308
Cakir, M. (2008). Constructivist approaches to learning in science and their implications for science pedagogy: A literature review. Inter-national Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(4), 193–206. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ894860.pdf
Christidou, V., Kazela, K., Kakana, D., & Valakosta, M. (2009). Teaching magnetic attraction to preschool children: A comparison of different approaches. International Journal of Learning, 16, 115-128. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v16i02/46130
Constantinou, C., Raftopoulos, A., Spanoudes, G., & Natsopoulos, D. (2013). Pre-schoolers construction of operational definitions in magnetism. The Journal of Emergent Science, 5, 6–21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237063119_Preschooler%27_Construction_of_Operational_Definitions_in_Magnetism
Dimitriou, D. (2015). Cultivating science skills in kindergarten by teaching magnets and their properties (Master thesis). https://dspace.uowm.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/200
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315747415
Finley, F. N. (1986). Evaluating Instruction: The complementary use of clinical interviews. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(7), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230706
Gopnik, A. (2012). Scientific Thinking in Young Children: Theoretical Advances, Empirical Research and Policy Implications. Science, 337(6102), 1623–1627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1223416
Hickey, R. & Schibeci, R. A. (1999). The attraction of magnetism. Physics Education, 34(6), 383–388. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/34/6/408
Kalogiannakis, M., Nirgianaki, G. M., & Papadakis, S. (2018). Teaching Magnetism to Preschool Children: The Effectiveness of Picture Story Reading. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46, 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0884-4
Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Alternative ideas about concepts of physics, a timelessly valuable tool for physics education. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 3(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/13776
Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs and graphing: tasks, learning and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060001001
Lemmer, M., Kriek, J. & Erasmus, B., (2019). Analysis of Students’ Conceptions of Basic Magnetism from a Complex Systems Perspective. Research in Science Education, 50, 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9693-z
Li, J. (2012). Improving students’ understanding of electricity and magnetism. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Pittsburgh. (Un-published). https://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/11767/1/Jing_Li%27s_Doctoral_Thesis_4_a%26s_format_revised7.pdf
Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarsky, B. (1997). From verbal descriptions to graphic representations: stability and change in students’ alternative conceptions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 229–263. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002965907987
Meyer, K. (1991). Children as experimenters: elementary students’ actions in an experimental context with magnets (Doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia. https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0055294
Piaget, J., & Chollet, M. (1973). Le problème de l’attraction à propos des aimants. In J. Piaget (ed.), La formation de la notion de force (pp. 223-243). Paris: PUF, Paris.
Poimenidou, Μ., & Christidou, V. (2010). Communication practices and the construction of meaning: science activities in the kindergaden. Creative Education, 1(2), 81–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2010.12013
Ravanis, K. (1994). The discovery of elementary magnetic properties in Preschool age. Qualitative and quantitative research within a Piagetian framework. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 2(2), 79–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13502939485207621
Rendon, J. D. L., Doloretos, N. L., Capilitan, L. B., Dumaan, D. L., Mamada, M. J. D., & Mercado, J. C. (2022). Alternative Teaching Methods in Electricity and Magnetism. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(8), 1600-1606. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.08.23
Samara, V., & Kotsis, T. K. (2023). The use of new technologies and robotics (STEM) in the teaching of sciences in primary education: the concept of magnetism: A bibliographic review. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i2.4652
Selman, R. L., Krupa, M. P., Stone, C. R., & Jacquette, D. S. (1982). Concrete Operational Thought and the Emergence of the Concept of Unseen Force in Children’s Theories of Electromagnetism and Gravity. Science Education, 66, 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660205
Skamp, K. (2011). Teaching primary science constructively. Cengage Learning.
Smolleck, L., & Hershberger, V. (2011). Playing with science: An investigation of young children's science conceptions and misconcep-tions. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1-32. https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/324/120
Sukariasih, L. (2016). The use of cognitive conflict strategy to reduce student misconceptions on the subject matter of rectilinear motion. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(6), 483 492. https://www.ijern.com/journal/2016/July-2016/38.pdf
Tanel, Z., & Erol, M. (2005). Lisans düzeyindeki öğrencilerin manyetik alan şiddeti, manyetik akı yoğunluğu ve manyetizasyon kavram-larına yönelik yanılgıları [Misconceptions of undergraduate students on the magnitude of magnetic field, magnetic flux density and magnetisation]. Türk Fizik Derneği 23. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=el&user=5MaOOIMAAAAJ&citation_for_view=5MaOOIMAAAAJ:kh2fBNsKQNwC
Temertzidou, E., Papadopoulou, P., & Kariotoglou, P. (2014). A study of preschool children's skills in classifying materials based on their magnetic properties (Greek). In Natural Sciences and Environment in Preschool Education Searches and Suggestions. Gutenberg. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280801641_Melete_ton_dexioteton_paidion_proscholikes_elikias_sten_taxinomese_ylikon_me_base_tis_magnetikes_tous_idiotetes#fullTextFileContent
Vosniadou, S., & Skopeliti, I. (2014). Conceptual change from the framework theory side of the fence. Science and Education, 23, 1427–1445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9640-3