Investigation of the Effectiveness of Gender on the Use of Politeness Requests in Communication in Teaching
Main Article Content
Abstract
During communication in the formal teaching and learning time in the classroom, teachers and students often make polite requests. However, the use of politeness in requests among the students and students’ reactions to teachers’ polite requests could be influenced by gender. This study attempted to explore the difference between male and female students in using politeness in request, an element of the politeness theory, and reaction towards the polite ones from teachers at the English language teaching ̣(ELT) context at the Asian International School (AIS). The participants in the current study are 100 first-year students from four classes of the English language teaching ̣department in the third semester of 2023. The data research was collected by the questionnaires. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software was used to analyze the collected data and find out the results. The result showed that the use of politeness in requests among the students and their reaction towards teachers’ polite requests in the classroom between male and female students are quite different. Specifically, the result of the study revealed that female students use politeness in requests more regularly than males’ and they tend to need teachers’ polite requests more than boys.
Metrics
Article Details
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Brown, G., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Haugh, M. (2006). Emic perspective on the positive-negative politeness distinction. Culture, Language, and Representation. Cultural Studies Journal of Universitat Jaume, 3, 17-26.
Homby, A, S. (1974). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kenji, K. (1990). A Study of Japanese and American Perceptions of Politeness in Requests. Doshisha Studies in English, 50, 178-210.
Kummer, M. (1992). Politeness in Thai. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kummer, M. (1992). 13. Politeness in Thai. In R. J. Watts, S. Ide, K. Ehlich (Eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice (pp. 325-336). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886542-016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886542-016
Lakoff, R. (1973). The Logic of Politeness, or Minding Your P’s and Q’s. Chicago Linguistics Society, 9, 292-305.
Leech, G, N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. B. K. (1983). Face in Interethnic Communication. In J. C. Richards, & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 156-188). London, United Kingdom: Longman..
Tran, V. M, Y. (2010). Vietnamese expression of preposition. Griffith working papers in pragmatics and intercultural communication, 3(1), 12-21.