Promoting Students’ Active Engagement in Online Teacher Education Courses

Main Article Content

Lu Wang
Christina Romero

Abstract

This paper explores the integration of digital tools in online teacher education courses to enhance active student engagement and support differentiated instruction, particularly for non-traditional teacher candidates. Drawing from the authors’ experiences, the study examines how technology tools (e.g. Zoom with Kaltura, simulations, SketchGraph, and AutoDraw), foster personalized learning, accommodate diverse needs, and provide opportunities for deeper engagement. Guided by the SAMR model, the analysis categorizes tools based on their functions in the teaching and learning practices, emphasizing their role in creating dynamic and inclusive learning environments. The findings highlight that digital tools enable active learning by encouraging critical engagement and moving away from traditional, passive modes of instruction. Through teacher modeling and differentiation, these tools empower learners to navigate complex concepts and build autonomy in their learning process. Practical strategies for implementing technology tools, such as modeling their use and providing clear, step-by-step instructions, are also discussed to address the challenges of online learning environments. This study contributes to the growing body of literature on technology integration in teacher education, offering insights into how digital tools can enhance learning experiences and prepare teacher candidates to adopt innovative instructional practices in their future classrooms.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Wang, L., & Romero, C. (2025). Promoting Students’ Active Engagement in Online Teacher Education Courses. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v3i1.436
Section
Research Articles

References

CAST. (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. Retrieved from https://udlguidelines.cast.org

Garrison, D. R. (2015). Thinking collaboratively: Learning in a community of inquiry. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740751

Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) Model: a Critical Review and Suggestions for its Use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y

Hilton, J. T. (2016). A Case Study of the Application of SAMR and TPACK for Reflection on Technology Integration into Two Social Studies Classrooms. The Social Studies, 107(2), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2015.1124376

Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education: A Literature Review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4- 29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713

Kirkland, A. B. (2014). Models for Technology Integration in the Learning Commons. School Libraries in Canada, 32(1), 14–18. https://journal.canadianschoollibraries.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/SLiCv32n1.pdf

Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education [Blog post]. http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/

Puentedura, R. (2009). As we may teach: educational technology, from theory into practice [Blog post]. http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/000025.html/

Romero-Ivanova, C., Shaughnessy, M., Otto, L., Taylor, E., & Watson, E. (2020). Digital practices & applications in a COVID-19 culture. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p80

Skopek, T. A., & Schuhmann, R. A. (2008). Traditional and non-traditional students in the same classroom? Additional challenges of the distance education environment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 11(1), 6. https://ojdla.com/archive/spring111/skopek111.pdf

The StoryGraph. (2024). Because life’s too short for a book you’re not in the mood for. https://www.thestorygraph.com

Wang, L., Hodges, G., & Lee, J. (2022). Connecting macroscopic, molecular, and symbolic representations with immersive technologies in high school chemistry: The case of redox reactions. Education Sciences, 12(7), 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070428