Gender-Based Teaching-Learning Classroom Dynamics in Human Sexuality Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article investigates the gender-based teaching-learning dynamics during human sexuality education, focusing on how the genders of teachers and students affect classroom discussions. Using Constructivist Grounded Theory, analysis was drawn from classroom observations, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions with theoretically sampled teachers and students. Documentations of these methods were done through audio-video recording, memoing, field notes and constant comparative analysis of saturated data. Results revealed that the teaching dynamics include gender prejudice; teacher competence; creation and maintenance of a safe environment; playful engagement; code switching and the use of vernacular; personalization and real-life application; teacher-directed instruction; and audio-visual aids utilization. The learning dynamics include sociocultural and multimedia influences, teacher gender preferences, teaching methods, language challenges, and religion’s influence. Gender dynamics affect students’ comfort levels and engagement, with female teachers being preferred to facilitate due to their perceived ability to foster a more comfortable learning environment. Male teachers face challenges in addressing sensitive topics with female students, leading to discomfort and decreased interactions and engagement. Humor, personalization of lessons, and code-switching also emerged as effective teaching approaches, though their success varies based on the gender composition of the class. These precipitates the need for gender-sensitive teaching strategies, up-training of teachers, and curriculum re-vision to eradicate issues in the teaching-learning process. The research provides valuable insights in improving human sexuality education by encouraging inclusive classroom dynamics.
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bawamenewi, A., Lase, J. H., Zega, E. F., & Gea, L. I. (2024). The Use of Audio-Visual Media on Student Learning Interest in Explanatory Text Material. International Journal of Language and Ubiquitous Learning, 2(2), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijlul.v2i2.1101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70177/ijlul.v2i2.1101
de Haas, B., & Hutter, I. (2021). Teachers’ personal experiences of sexual initiation motivating their sexuality education messages in secondary schools in Kampala, Uganda. Sex Education, 22(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2021.1898360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2021.1898360
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Johnson, B., Flentje, J., & Bartholomaeus, C. (2020). Co-researching and designing innovative learning approaches in sexuality and rela-tionships education. Pastoral Care in Education, 38(3), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2020.1773907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2020.1773907
Lavy, V., & Megalokonomou, R. (2024). The Short- and the Long-Run impact of Gender-Biased Teachers. American Economic Journal Applied Economics, 16(2), 176–218. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20210052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20210052
Mamnoun, S., & Nfissi, A. (2023). Investigating Classroom Interaction from a Gender Perspective: A Comprehensive Review of Relevant Studies. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices, 5(2), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.32996/jweep.2023.5.2.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/jweep.2023.5.2.3
Masunungure, A., & Maguvhe, M. O. (2024). Barriers to teaching in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms in mainstream sec-ondary schools. Journal for Multicultural Education, 19(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-12-2023-0134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-12-2023-0134
Mebert, L., Barnes, R., Dalley, J., Gawarecki, L., Ghazi-Nezami, F., Shafer, G., Slater, J., & Yezbick, E. (2020). Fostering student en-gagement through a real-world, collaborative project across disciplines and institutions. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1750306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1750306
Mercer, J. A. (2021). Gender, Sexuality, and Religious Education. Religious Education, 116(3), 187-189. DOI: 10.1080/00344087.2021.1926645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00344087.2021.1926645
Mohajan, D., & Mohajan, H. K. (2022). Constructivist Grounded Theory: a new research approach in social science. Research and Advances in Education, 1(4), 8–16. DOI: 10.56397/RAE.2022.10.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56397/RAE.2022.10.02
Nagal, R. K. (2020). Glocalized Experiential Learning infused resource package in earth and life science. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 40(1), 153–180. https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v40i1.777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v40i1.777
Nagal, R. K. I. (2023). Penis and vagina’s conversations: A dialogic theory grounded on academic intercourse of human sexuality (Doctoral dissertation). West Visayas State University Repository.
Russell, K. N., & Gruys, K. (2021). How do gender, sexuality, and age impact perceptions of teacher sexual misconduct? an inter-sectional Vignette-Based study. Feminist Criminology, 17(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085121998748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085121998748
Russell, S. J., Bishop, M. D., Saba, V. C., James, I. B., & Ioverno, S. (2021). Promoting School Safety for LGBTQ and All Students. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(2), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322211031938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322211031938
Shivali. (2022). Use of audio visuals aids in teaching and learning. Shivali Blog Post. https://edusites.uregina.ca/shivalieducationaltechnology/2022/10/10/use-of-audio-visuals-aids-in-teaching-and-learning/
Slominski, K. (2020). How religion made modern sex ed. SSRC The Immanent Frame. https://tif.ssrc.org/2020/08/21/how-religion-made-modern-sex-ed/
Stewart, R. E., Wright, B., Smith, L. D. G., Roberts, S. B., & Russell, N. (2021). Gendered stereotypes and norms: A systematic review of interventions designed to shift attitudes and behaviour. Heliyon, 7(4), e06660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06660
Stough, L. M., & Lee, S. (2021). Grounded theory approaches used in educational research journals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211052203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211052203
Tareen, M. K., Tareen, H. K., & Nazmine, N. (2021). Measuring the Impact of Audio/Visual AIDs on Learning Process: A case study of South Punjab. Journal of Peace Development & Communication, 5(1), 163–175. https://pdfpk.net/pdf/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Measuring-the-Impact-of-Audio-Visual-Aids-on-Learning-Process-A-Case-Study-of-South-Punjab.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.36968/JPDC-V05-I01-15
United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). (2020). Eliminating Teenage Pregnancy in the Philippines. Policy Brief, January 2020, 2. Retrieved May 24, 2021 from https://philippines.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/UNFPA_Policy_Brief_Teenage_Pregnancy_%282020-01-24%29.pdf
Van, V. T. S., Uy, J., Bagas, J., & Ulep, V. G. T. (2021). Trends in National-Level Governance and Implementation of the Philippines’ Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Law from 2014 to 2020. Global Health Science and Practice, 9(3), 548–564. https://doi.org/10.9745/ghsp-d-21-00184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00184
Vebrianto, R., Rus, R. B. C., Jannah, M., Putriani, Z., & Syafaren, A. (2020). Study of strengthening 21st-century skills in prospective science teacher based on gender. Jurnal Bioedukatika, 8(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v8i1.14619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v8i1.14619
Weisi, H., & Mohammadi, V. (2023). Humour in the classroom. European Journal of Humour Research, 11(1), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.7592/ejhr.2023.11.1.739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2023.11.1.739