The Role of Feedback in Teacher Professional Development
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper examines how professional development (PD) facilitators obtain feedback about the effectiveness of sessions they facilitate and to what extent feedback is an integral part of their planning. Three professional development facilitators with varying degrees of experience served as participants in this study. One-on-one semi-structured interviews were used to collect data, and the data were analyzed utilizing an interpretative phenomenological approach (IPA). The findings showed that the participants obtained feedback from teachers using different methods before, during, and after their professional development sessions. The facilitators used feedback to plan and check the effectiveness of their sessions, and feedback was an integral part of their professional development work.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Alder, G. S. (2007). Examining the relationship between feedback and performance in a monitored environment: A clarification and extension of feedback intervention theory. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 17(2), 157-174. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S104783100600023X
Barana, A., Marchisio, M., & Sacchet, M. (2021). Interactive feedback for learning mathematics in a digital learning environment. Education Sciences, 11(6), 279. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/6/279
Bates, C. C., & Morgan, D. N. (2018). Seven elements of effective professional development. The Reading Teacher, 71(5), 623-626. https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/trtr.1674
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Cateté, V., Alvarez, L., Isvik, A., Milliken, A., Hill, M., & Barnes, T. (2020). Aligning theory and practice in teacher professional devel-opment for computer science. In Koli Calling'20: Proceedings of the 20th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (pp. 1-11). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3428029.3428560
Chien, C. W. (2020). Analysis of elementary school English teachers' professional dialogue as their professional development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 45(5), 1-17. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4113&context=ajte
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review/teacher learning: What matters. Educational leadership, 66(5), 46-53.
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019). What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 25-36. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://isidore.udayton.edu/access/content/group/48d85ee6-68d7-4a63-ac4e-db6c0e01d494/EDT650/readings/Desimone_Laura_M.pdf
Dickinson, D. K., & Brady, J. P. (2006). Toward effective support for language and literacy through professional development. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Critical issues in early childhood professional development (pp. 141-170). Baltimore, MD, US: Paul H Brookes Publishing.
Duijnhouwer, H. (2010). Feedback effects on students’ writing motivation, process, and performance. Utrecht University.
Fishman, E. J., Borko, H., Osborne, J., Gomez, F., Rafanelli, S., Reigh, E., Tseng, A., Million S., & Berson, E. (2017). A practice-based professional development program to support scientific argumentation from evidence in the elementary classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(3), 222-249.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. https://www.uvm.edu/~rsingle/JournalClub/papers/Garet%2BAERJ-2001_TeacherProfDevelopment.pdf
Gill, M. J. (2014). The possibilities of phenomenology for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 118-137.
Gubbins, E. J., & Hayden, S. M. (2021). Professional development. In Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 349-360). Routledge.
Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000709
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=a341536770fc149df10408865bfb58f76246cfdc
Heller, J. I., Daehler, K. R., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 333-362.
Hertz, B., Grainger Clemson, H., Tasic Hansen, D., Laurillard, D., Murray, M., Fernandes, L., Gilleran, A., Rojas Ruiz, D., & Rutkauskiene, D. (2022). A pedagogical model for effective online teacher professional development – findings from the Teacher Academy ini-tiative of the European Commission. European Journal of Education, 57, 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12486
Hunt, P., Leijen, Ä., & van der Schaaf, M. (2021). Automated feedback is nice and human presence makes it better: Teachers’ perceptions of feedback by means of an e-portfolio enhanced with learning analytics. Education Sciences, 11(6), 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060278
Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M. & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes & efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10).
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.
Kang, H. S., Cha, J., & Ha, B. W. (2013). What should we consider in teachers’ professional development impact studies? Based on the conceptual framework of Desimone. Creative Education, 4(04), 11. https://www.scirp.org/html/30903.html
Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Form and substance in in-service teacher education (Research Monograph No. 13). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED472719.pdf. 154
Kunemund, R. L., Kennedy, M. J., Carlisle, L. M., VanUitert, V. J., & McDonald, S. D. (2022). A multimedia option for delivering feedback and professional development to teachers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(2), 336-346. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1342500.pdf
McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semi-Structured Interviews. Global qualitative nursing research, 2, 2333393615597674. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393615597674
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th Ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Moerer-Urdahl, T., & Creswell, J. W. (2004). Using transcendental phenomenology to explore the “ripple effect” in a leadership mentoring program. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(2), 19-35.
Mundry, S. (2005). Changing perspectives in professional development. Science Educator, 14(1), 9-15.
Nese, R. N., Meng, P., Breiner, S., Chaparro, E., & Algozzine, R. (2020). Using stakeholder feedback to improve online professional development opportunities. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(2), 148-162. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED606460.pdf
Nordgren, K., Kristiansson, M., Liljekvist, Y., & Bergh, D. (2021). Collegial collaboration when planning and preparing lessons: A large-scale study exploring the conditions and infrastructure for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, 103513.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). TALIS 2018 technical report. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/talis/TALIS_2018_
Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2022). A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational Research Review, 35, 100416. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X21000397
Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, J. A. (2014). A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psy-chology. Psychological Journal, 20(1), 7-14.
Popova, A., Evans, D. K., Breeding, M. E., & Arancibia, V. (2022). Teacher professional development around the world: The gap between evidence and practice. The World Bank Research Observer, 37(1), 107-136. https://academic.oup.com/wbro/article/37/1/107/6292021?login=true
Rabionet, S. E. (2011). How I learned to design and conduct semi-structured interviews: an ongoing and continuous journey. Qualitative Report, 16(2), 563-566.
Scheeler, M. C., Congdon, M., & Stansbery, S. (2010). Providing immediate feedback to co-teachers through bug-in-ear technology: An effective method of peer coaching in inclusion classrooms. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406409357013
Shortland, S. (2010). Feedback within peer observation: continuing professional development and unexpected consequences. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.498181
Shulman, L. S. (1998). Theory, practice, and the education of professionals. The Elementary School Journal, 511-526.
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
Smith, J. A. (2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088704qp004oa
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage.
Snyder, P., & Wolfe, B. (2008). The big three process components of effective professional development: Needs assessment, evaluation, and follow-up. In P. J. Winton, J. A. McCollum, & C. Catlett (Eds.). Practical approaches to early childhood professional development: Evidence, strategies, and resources (pp. 13-51). Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
Thurlings, M., & den Brok, P. (2017). Learning outcomes of teacher professional development activities: a meta-study. Educational Review, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1281226
Voerman, L., Meijer, P. C., Korthagen, F., & Simons, R. J. (2015). Promoting effective teacher-feedback: From theory to practice through a multiple component trajectory for professional development. Teachers and Teaching, 21(8), 990-1009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1005868