A Writing Needs Analysis of Moroccan Engineering Students

Main Article Content

Marouane Ait Hammou
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1781-9579
Bani Koumachi
Lahcen Belmekki

Abstract

This study investigates the specific writing needs and document types in Moroccan engineering education through a needs analysis involving 253 participants, including engineers, teachers, and students. Using a quantitative approach, data are collected through questionnaires to identify key writing tasks and document requirements relevant to engineering professionals. The study reveals significant writing needs in areas such as technical reports, project documentation, and professional correspondence. Results indicate that students often struggle with technical writing sub-skills, including clarity, coherence, and appropriate use of technical vocabulary. The analysis highlights a gap between current writing instruction methods and practical needs. Data analysis using SPSS identifies common document types and their specific writing requirements. Descriptive statistics, and Cronbach’s Alpha for reliability, are conducted to assess the relationship between identified needs and current instructional practices. The findings underscore the importance of aligning writing instruction with the engineering profession’s requirements to enhance workforce preparedness. Tailored writing courses are recommended to address these needs effectively. This research offers valuable insights into the specific writing needs of engineering students and professionals and provides practical recommendations for curriculum development, advocating for teaching methods that align with modern engineering environments.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Ait Hammou, M., Koumachi, B., & Belmekki, L. (2024). A Writing Needs Analysis of Moroccan Engineering Students. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i3.240
Section
Research Articles

References

Abouabdelkader, S., Abouabdelkader, H., & Kaddour, K. (2023). The impact of presentation skills on Moroccan engineering students’ language abilities. Training, Language and Culture, 7, 79-93. 10.22363/2521-442X-2023-7-3-79-93.

Basturkmen, H. (2006). Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399-413.

Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Doghonadze, N., & Gorgiladze, G. (2008). Problem Solving in Teaching Foreign Languages to Students of Pedagogical Departments. IBSU Scientific Journal, 2, 101-114.

Eunson, B. (2012). Scientific and Technical Writing. John Wiley & Sons Australia

Graves, K. (2000). Designing Language Course. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Hendarwati, E., Nurlaela, L., Bachri, B., & Sa’ida, N. (2021). Collaborative problem-based learning integrated with online learning. In-ternational Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(13), 29-39.

Holec, H. (1980). Learner-centered communicative language teaching: needs analysis revisited. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 26–33. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100000176

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Pearson Education.

Kustepeli, Y. (2014). Technical writing in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 241-251.

Lindsay, C., & Knight, P. (2006). Learning And Teaching English: A Course For Teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.

Long, M. (2005). Methodological Issues in Learner Needs Analysis. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second Language Needs Analysis (pp. 19-76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667299.002

Munby, J. (1978). Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (1988). The Learner-Centered Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524506

Jafari Pazoki, S., & Alemi, M. (2020). Engineering Students’ Motivation to Learn Technical English in ESP Courses: Investigating Iranian Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions. RELC Journal, 51(2), 212-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218811371

Perry, L. (2009). Developing communication skills in engineering. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 135(4), 132-138.

Pratt, D. (1980). Curriculum design and development. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richterich, R., & Chancerel, J. L. (1987). Identifying the Needs of Adults Learning a Foreign Language. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Robinson, P. (1991). ESP Today: A Practitioner’s Guide. New York: Prentice Hall.

Sanghori, M. (2008). Introduction needs analysis. English for Specific Purposes World, 4, 1-27.

Strevens, P. (1988). ESP after Twenty Years: A Re-Appraisal. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), ESP State of Art (pp. 1-13). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Centre.

Tsui, A. B. M. (2002). Teaching Chinese-English bilinguals: The challenge of writing in two languages. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(2), 169-184.

West, R. (1994). Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching, 27(1), 1–19.

Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.