Harnessing AI to Power Constructivist Learning: An Evolution in Educational Methodologies
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article navigates the confluence of the age-old constructivist philosophy of education and modern Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools as a means of reconceptualizing teaching and learning methods. While constructivism champions active learning derived from personal experiences and prior knowledge, AI’s adaptive capacities seamlessly align with these principles, offering personalized, dynamic, and enriching learning avenues. By leveraging AI platforms such as ChatGPT, BARD, and Microsoft Bing, educators can elevate constructivist pedagogy, fostering enhanced student engagement, self-reflective metacognition, profound conceptual change, and an enriched learning experience. The article further emphasizes the preservation of humanistic values in the integration of AI, ensuring a balanced, ethical, and inclusive educational environment. This exploration sheds light on the transformative potential of inter-twining traditional educational philosophies with technological advancements, paving the way for a more responsive and effective learning paradigm.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abbott, J., & Ryan, T. (1999). Constructing knowledge, reconstructing schooling. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 66-69.
Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The journal of the learning sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
Bennett, E. & Foltz, P. W. (2019). The constructivist ethics algorithm: Value sensitive design for ethical mediation between humans and systems. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 132, 110-124.
Biswas, G., Segedy, J. R., & Bunchongchit, K. (2016). From design to implementation to practice a learning by teaching system: Betty's Brain. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 350-364.
Blair, K., Schwartz, D. L., Biswas, G., & Leelawong, K. (2007). Pedagogical agents for learning by teaching: Teachable agents. Educational Technology, 47(1), 56-61.
Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819-837.
Leelawong, K., & Biswas, G. (2008). Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty's Brain system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18(3), 181-208.
Li, N., Cohen, W. W., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Discovering student models with a corpus of explanation. In Workshops at the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. https://educationaldatamining.org/EDM2013/proceedings/paper_55.pdf
Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46-60.
Matthews, M. R. (2003). Constructivism in science and mathematics education. International handbook of science education, 1, 161-192.
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582-599.
Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Improving students’ help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 267-280.
Rus, V., D’Mello, S., Hu, X., & Graesser, A. C. (2013). Recent advances in conversational intelligent tutoring systems. AI magazine, 34(3), 42-54.
Teo, T. W., & Zhou, M. (2017). The influence of teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning on their technology acceptance. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 513-527.
Vosniadou, S. (2013). International handbook of research on conceptual change. Routledge.