Artificial Intelligence Helps Primary School Teachers to Plan and Execute Physics Classroom Experiments
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research claims that artificial intelligence technologies can help and direct primary school teachers in organising classroom experiments for physics instruction. Educators now have the potential to construct experimental projects that are entertaining and efficient, all while catering to their students’ many learning styles and capabilities. This is made possible by the availability of artificial intelligence technologies. The incorporation of artificial intelligence into educational settings may result in an improvement in the overall quality of teaching as well as an improvement in the scientific performance of students. The chance to improve the learning experience for both students and teachers is available to educators who do an in-depth study on artificial intelligence-driven teaching solutions. The research highlights how artificial intelligence can transform teaching approaches in elementary school, notably in the field of physics education within the context of primary school settings.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep429. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152
Ahmad Uzir, N. A., Gašević, D., Matcha, W., Jovanović, J., & Pardo, A. (2020). Analytics of time management strategies in a flipped classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(1), 70-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12392
Alam, A. (2021). Possibilities and apprehensions in the landscape of artificial intelligence in education. In 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications, IEEE (pp. 1-8). Nagpur, India. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCICA52458.2021.9697272
Al-Gerafi, M. A., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., & Wijaya, T. T. (2023). Unlocking the potential: A comprehensive evaluation of augmented reality and virtual reality in education. Electronics, 12(18), 3953. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12183953
Almulla, M. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2023). Integrated social cognitive theory with learning input factors: the effects of problem-solving skills and critical thinking skills on learning performance sustainability. Sustainability, 15(5), 3978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053978
Anderson, J., & Taner, G. (2023). Building the expert teacher prototype: A metasummary of teacher expertise studies in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 38, 100485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100485
Austin, T., Rawal, B. S., Diehl, A., & Cosme, J. (2023). AI for Equity: Unpacking Potential Human Bias in Decision Making in Higher Education. AI, Computer Science and Robotics Technology. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/acrt.20
Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2021). Effect of integrating physics education technology simulations on students’ conceptual under-standing in physics: A review of literature. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 023108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.023108
Beyene, W. M., Mekonnen, A. T., & Giannoumis, G. A. (2023). Inclusion, access, and accessibility of educational resources in higher education institutions: exploring the Ethiopian context. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(1), 18-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1817580
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The journal of the learning sciences, 2(2), 141-178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
Bruneau, P., Wang, J., Cao, L., & Trương, H. (2023). The Potential of ChatGPT to Enhance Physics Education in Vietnamese High Schools. Journal Physics Education. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/36qw9
Bundick, M. J., Quaglia, R. J., Corso, M. J., & Haywood, D. E. (2014). Promoting student engagement in the classroom. Teachers College Record, 116(4), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681141160
Burggräf, P., Wagner, J., Saßmannshausen, T., Weißer, T., & Radisic-Aberger, O. (2024). AI-artifacts in engineering change management – a systematic literature review. Research in Engineering Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-023-00430-6
Cant, R.P., Ryan, C.L., & Kelly, M.A. (2022). Use and Effectiveness of Virtual Simulations in Nursing Student Education. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 41, 31 - 38. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000932
Chen, Y., Jensen, S., Albert, L. J., Gupta, S., & Lee, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) student assistants in the classroom: Designing chatbots to support student success. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(1), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10291-4
Chiu, T. K., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023). Influence of pedagogical beliefs and perceived trust on teachers’ acceptance of educational artificial intelligence tools. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(4), 910-922. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2049145
Costan, E., Gonzales, G., Gonzales, R., Enriquez, L., Costan, F., Suladay, D., ... & Ocampo, L. (2021). Education 4.0 in developing economies: a systematic literature review of implementation barriers and future research agenda. Sustainability, 13(22), 12763. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212763
Dandurand, F., Shultz, T. R., & Onishi, K. H. (2008). Comparing online and lab methods in a problem-solving experiment. Behavior Research Methods, 40(2), 428–434. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.2.428
Darling-Hammond, L., & Baratz-Snowden, J. (2007). A Good Teacher in Every Classroom: Preparing the Highly Qualified Teachers Our Children Deserve. Educational Horizons, 85(2), 111–132. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42926597
de Carvalho, J. S., Oliveira, S., Roberto, M. S., Gonçalves, C., Bárbara, J. M., de Castro, A. F., Pereira, R., Franco, M., Cadima, J., Leal, T., Lemos, M. S., & Marques-Pinto, A. (2021). Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention for teachers: a study on teacher and student outcomes. Mindfulness, 12(7), 1719-1732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01635-3
Diana, N. (2021). Analysis of teachers’ difficulties in implementing STEM approach in learning: A study literature. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1806, No. 1, p. 012219). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012219
Divine O., Seong No, Y., & Don Hee L. (2023). Academic Integrity in a Digital Era: Should the Use of ChatGPT Be Banned in Schools? Global business & finance review, 28(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.7.1
Du, X., Dai, M., Tang, H., Hung, J. L., Li, H., & Zheng, J. (2023). A multimodal analysis of college students’ collaborative problem solving in virtual experimentation activities: A perspective of cognitive load. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(2), 272-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09311-8
Fabrègue, B.F., & Bogoni, A. (2023). Privacy and Security Concerns in the Smart City. Smart Cities, 6(1), 586-613. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6010027
Fake, H., & Dabbagh, N. (2023). Designing Personalized Learning Experiences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003121008
Fariani, R. I., Junus, K., & Santoso, H. B. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review on Personalised Learning in the Higher Education Context. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(2), 449-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09628-4
Ferguson, T., Iliško, D., Roofe, C. and Hill, S. (2018). Case Studies, Case Study One: Latvia, Case Study Two: Jamaica, SDG4 – Quality Education (Concise Guides to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals). Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-423-120181011
Hamed, G., & Aljanazrah, A. (2020). The effectiveness of using virtual experiments on students’ learning in the general physics lab. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 976-995. https://doi.org/10.28945/4668
Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in Science Edu-cation, 40, 743-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9142-0
Hote, S.V. (2024). A Survey Paper Review on Advancements in AI-Driven User Interface Testing. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12 (2), 674–678. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.57902
Josyula, H. P., Reddi, L. T., Parate, S., & Rajagopal, A. (2023). A Review on Security and Privacy Considerations in Programmable Pay-ments. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(9s), 256–263. https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/4272
Kamat, Y., & Nasnodkar, S. (2019). A Survey on the Barriers and Facilitators to EdTech Adoption in Rural Schools in Developing Countries. International Journal of Intelligent Automation and Computing, 2(1), 32–51. https://research.tensorgate.org/index.php/IJIAC/article/view/58
Kandemir, I., & Cicek, K. (2023). Development an instructional design model selection approach for maritime education and training using fuzzy axiomatic design. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 11291-11312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11623-w
Karlberg, M., & Bezzina, C. (2022). The professional development needs of beginning and experienced teachers in four municipalities in Sweden. Professional Development in Education, 48(4), 624-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1712451
Kilbourne, J., Scott-Webber, L., & Kapitula, L.R. (2023). An Activity-Permissible Classroom: Impacts of an Evidence-Based Design Solution on Student Engagement and Movement in an Elementary School Classroom. Children, Youth and Environments, 27, 112-134. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.27.1.0112
Kortemeyer, G. (2023). Toward AI grading of student problem solutions in introductory physics: A feasibility study. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020163. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020163
Kotsis, K.T. (2024). Obstacles to Teaching Science in Primary School and Strategies to Overcome Them. European Journal of Con-temporary Education and E-Learning, 2(1), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(1).18
Larios, R. J., & Zetlin, A. (2023). Challenges to preparing teachers to instruct all students in inclusive classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103945
Lavonen, J., Jauhiainen, J., Koponen, I. T., & Kurki‐Suonio, K. (2004). Effect of a long‐term in‐service training program on teachers’ beliefs about the role of experiments in physics education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006903200007433
Leaton-Gray, S. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Schools: Towards a Democratic Future. London Review of Education, 18(2), 163-177. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1297439
Lee, I., & Perret, B. (2022). Preparing High School Teachers to Integrate AI Methods into STEM Classrooms. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 12783-12791). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21557
Lesh, R., & Kelly, A. (2012). Multitiered teaching experiments. In Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 197–230). Routledge.
Li, K.C., & Wong, B.T.M. (2021). Features and trends of personalised learning: A review of journal publications from 2001 to 2018. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(2), 182-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1811735
Li, K.C., & Wong, B.T.M. (2023). Personalisation in STE (A) M education: a review of literature from 2011 to 2020. Journal of Com-puting in Higher Education, 35(1), 186-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09341-2
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M. & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed. An argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson.
Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual reality in education: a review of learning theories, ap-proaches and methodologies for the last decade. Electronics, 12(13), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832
Meltzer, D. E., & Otero, V. K. (2014). Transforming the preparation of physics teachers. American Journal of Physics, 82(7), 633-637. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4868023
Michael, B. (2022). Professional Development Opportunities. TCB: Technical Services in Religion & Theology, 30(4), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.31046/tcb.v30i4.3197.
Mobile Computing, W.C. (2023). Retracted: Data Analysis and Feedback System Construction of University Students’ Psychological Fitness Based on Fuzzy Clustering. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2023, 9896486. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9896486
Narayanan, S., Sarin, P., Pawar, N., & Murthy, S. (2023). Teaching research skills for experimental physics in an undergraduate electronics lab. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020103
Nazer, L. H., Zatarah, R., Waldrip, S., Ke, J. X. C., Moukheiber, M., Khanna, A. K., ... & Mathur, P. (2023). Bias in artificial intelligence algorithms and recommendations for mitigation. PLOS Digital Health, 2(6), e0000278. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000278
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221-4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
Obidovna, D. Z. (2023). Adapting teaching methods to moder educational trends: Pedagogical aspect. International Journal of Pedagogics, 3(10), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume03Issue10-14
Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Glazewski, K., Jeon, M., Jantaraweragul, K., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Scribner, A., ... & Lester, J. (2023). Lessons learned for AI education with elementary students and teachers. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(2), 267-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00304-3
Ouyang, F., Wu, M., Zheng, L., Zhang, L., & Jiao, P. (2023). Integration of artificial intelligence performance prediction and learning analytics to improve student learning in online engineering course. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00372-4
Page, A., Anderson, J., & Charteris, J. (2023). Including students with disabilities in innovative learning environments: a model for in-clusive practices. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(14), 1696-1711. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1916105
Pedler, M., Hudson, S., & Yeigh, T. (2020). The teachers’ role in student engagement: A review. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 45(3), 48–62. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.270830255864389
Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESDOC. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12799/6533
Pizarro-Pedraza, A., Suñer, F., & De Cock, B. (2024). Beyond Bleeps and Bounds: The Role of Individual Differences in Under-standing Taboo Language from TV Series in the L2. Languages, 9(3), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9030074
Qadir, J. (2023). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. In 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference IEEE (pp. 1-9). Kuwait. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121
Rietsche, R., & Söllner, M. (2019). Insights into Using IT-Based Peer Feedback to Practice the Students Providing Feedback Skill. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.009
Rodríguez-López, S. (2024). Historical Perspectives on Education Reform in Argentina: Lessons from the 20th Century. Research and Advances in Education, 3(2), 1–5. https://www.paradigmpress.org/rae/article/view/1005
Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
Sarsa, S., Denny, P., Hellas, A., & Leinonen, J. (2022). Automatic Generation of Programming Exercises and Code Explanations Using Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501385.3543957
Savolainen, T. (2023). A safe learning environment from the perspective of Laurea University of applied sciences safety, security and risk management students and staff. Heliyon, 9(3), e12836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12836
Sayfulloevna, S. S. (2023). Safe Learning Environment and Personal Development of Students. International Journal of Formal Education, 2(3), 7–12. http://journals.academiczone.net/index.php/ijfe/article/view/605
Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., Croker, S., & Härtig, H. (2016). What students learn from hands‐on activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 980-1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21320
Shang, S., Gao, M., & Luo, L. (2021). An improved hybrid ontology-based approach for online learning resource recommendations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2637 - 2661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10029-0
Shemshack, A., Spector, J.M. (2020). A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms. Smart Learning Environments,7(33). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00140-9
Stephenson, N. S., & Sadler-McKnight, N. P. (2016). Developing critical thinking skills using the science writing heuristic in the chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00102A
Tohara, A. J. T. (2021). Exploring digital literacy strategies for students with special educational needs in the digital age. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(9), 3345-3358. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i9.5741
Ulven, J. B., & Wangen, G. (2021). A systematic review of cybersecurity risks in higher education. Future Internet, 13(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13020039
Vlachos, I., Stylos, G., & Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Primary school teachers’ attitudes towards experimentation in physics teaching. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/13830
Yu, D. G., Li, Q., Song, W., Xu, L., Zhang, K., & Zhou, T. (2023). Advanced technique-based combination of innovation education and safety education in higher education. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(2), 507–516. https://doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00568
Yu, H. (2024). The application and challenges of ChatGPT in educational transformation: New demands for teachers’ roles. Heliyon, 10(2), e24289, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24289
Yu, S. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence in physical education. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 2023(60), p3774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720921996604
Zepeda, S. J. (2019). Professional development: What works. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315386744